From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mhocko@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
marc@merlins.org, mhocko@suse.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
tj@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mm, oom: stop pre-mature high-order OOM killer invocations" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:43:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <148043779023681@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161129162515.GD9796@dhcp22.suse.cz>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mm, oom: stop pre-mature high-order OOM killer invocations
to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mm-oom-stop-pre-mature-high-order-oom-killer-invocations.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From mhocko@kernel.org Tue Nov 29 17:42:17 2016
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:25:15 +0100
Subject: mm, oom: stop pre-mature high-order OOM killer invocations
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Stable tree <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <20161129162515.GD9796@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Content-Disposition: inline
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
31e49bfda184 ("mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more for
!CONFIG_COMPACTION") was an attempt to reduce chances of pre-mature OOM
killer invocation for high order requests. It seemed to work for most
users just fine but it is far from bullet proof and obviously not
sufficient for Marc who has reported pre-mature OOM killer invocations
with 4.8 based kernels. 4.9 will all the compaction improvements seems
to be behaving much better but that would be too intrusive to backport
to 4.8 stable kernels. Instead this patch simply never declares OOM for
!costly high order requests. We rely on order-0 requests to do that in
case we are really out of memory. Order-0 requests are much more common
and so a risk of a livelock without any way forward is highly unlikely.
Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Tested-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3161,6 +3161,16 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_contex
if (!order || order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
return false;
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
+ /*
+ * This is a gross workaround to compensate a lack of reliable compaction
+ * operation. We cannot simply go OOM with the current state of the compaction
+ * code because this can lead to pre mature OOM declaration.
+ */
+ if (order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
+ return true;
+#endif
+
/*
* There are setups with compaction disabled which would prefer to loop
* inside the allocator rather than hit the oom killer prematurely.
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mhocko@kernel.org are
queue-4.8/mm-oom-stop-pre-mature-high-order-oom-killer-invocations.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-29 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20161121154336.GD19750@merlins.org>
2016-11-21 21:50 ` 4.8.8 kernel trigger OOM killer repeatedly when I have lots of RAM that should be free Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-21 21:56 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-21 23:03 ` [PATCH] block,blkcg: use __GFP_NOWARN for best-effort allocations in blkcg Tejun Heo
2016-11-22 15:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-22 16:48 ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-22 22:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-23 8:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-28 17:19 ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-29 7:25 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-29 16:38 ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-29 16:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-29 17:13 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-29 17:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-29 17:28 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-29 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-22 16:00 ` Jens Axboe
2016-11-22 16:06 ` 4.8.8 kernel trigger OOM killer repeatedly when I have lots of RAM that should be free Marc MERLIN
2016-11-22 16:14 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-22 16:25 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-22 16:47 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-22 16:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-11-29 16:25 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-29 16:43 ` gregkh [this message]
2016-11-29 16:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-11-22 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-23 6:34 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-23 6:53 ` Hillf Danton
2016-11-23 7:00 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-23 9:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-28 7:23 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-28 20:55 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-29 15:55 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-29 16:07 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-29 16:34 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-29 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-29 17:40 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-29 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-30 17:47 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-30 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-30 18:21 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-30 18:27 ` Jens Axboe
2016-11-30 20:30 ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-01 13:50 ` Kent Overstreet
2016-12-01 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-01 18:30 ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-01 18:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-01 18:46 ` Jens Axboe
2016-11-29 23:01 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-30 13:58 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-02 4:12 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-02 7:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-02 14:15 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-02 10:44 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-11-29 16:15 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-22 21:46 ` Simon Kirby
2016-11-28 8:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=148043779023681@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc@merlins.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox