linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"jbaron@akamai.com" <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"sathya.prakash@broadcom.com" <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
	"suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com" 
	<suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Sreekanth.Reddy@broadcom.com" <Sreekanth.Reddy@broadcom.com>,
	"chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com" <chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com>,
	"dledford@redhat.com" <dledford@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: mpt3sas: fix hang on ata passthru commands
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 14:22:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483280506.5512.1.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483226343.2518.32.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Sat, 2016-12-31 at 15:19 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-29 at 00:02 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:30:24PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> > > Add a new parameter to scsi_internal_device_block() to decide 
> > > whether or not to invoke scsi_wait_for_queuecommand().
> > 
> > We'll also need to deal with the blk-mq wait path that Bart has been
> > working on (I think it's already in the scsi tree, but I'd have to
> > check).
> > 
> > Also adding a bool flag for the last call in a function is style 
> > that's a little annoying.
> > 
> > I'd prefer to add a scsi_internal_device_block_nowait that contains
> > all the code except for the waiting, and then make
> > scsi_internal_device_block_nowait a wrapper around it.  Or drop the
> > annoying internal for both while we're at it :)
> 
> OK, I know it's new year, but this is an unpatched regression in -rc1
> that's causing serious issues.  I would like this fixed by -rc3 so we
> have 3 options
> 
>    1. revert all the queuecommand wait stuff until it proves it's actually
>       working without regressions
>    2. apply this patch and fix the style issues later
>    3. someone else supplies the correctly styled fix patch
> 
> The conservative in me says that 1. is probably the most correct thing
> to do because it gives us time to get the queuecommand wait stuff
> right; that's what I'll probably do if there's no movement next week. 
>  However, since we're reasonably early in the -rc cycle, so either 2 or
> 3 are viable provided no further regressions caused by the queuecommand
> wait stuff pop up.

Hello James,

My recommendation is to revert commit 18f6084a989b ("scsi: mpt3sas: Fix
secure erase premature termination"). Since the mpt3sas driver uses the
single-queue approach and since the SCSI core unlocks the block layer
request queue lock before the .queuecommand callback function is called,
multiple threads can execute that callback function (scsih_qcmd() in this
case) simultaneously. This means that using scsi_internal_device_block()
from inside .queuecommand to serialize SCSI command execution is wrong.

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-01 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-29  4:30 [PATCH] scsi: mpt3sas: fix hang on ata passthru commands Jason Baron
2016-12-29  8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-29 16:02   ` Jason Baron
2016-12-31 23:19   ` James Bottomley
2017-01-01 14:22     ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-01-01 15:30       ` Jason Baron
2017-01-01 16:33       ` David Miller
2017-01-01 17:39         ` James Bottomley
2017-01-03 20:46           ` Jason Baron
2017-01-15 17:01             ` James Bottomley
2017-01-16 16:20               ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-06  1:59           ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-01-06 15:46             ` Sreekanth Reddy
2017-01-10  4:50               ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-01-16 20:01             ` James Bottomley
2017-01-16 21:01               ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-01-17  9:20                 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-17 14:13               ` Sreekanth Reddy
2017-01-17 14:15                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-17 19:44                   ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-01-17 14:44                 ` James Bottomley
2016-12-29 16:16 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1483280506.5512.1.camel@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=Sreekanth.Reddy@broadcom.com \
    --cc=chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
    --cc=suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).