From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937590AbdAESmU (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:42:20 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:28038 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934243AbdAESkn (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:40:43 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,322,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="49719246" Message-ID: <1483641642.2833.10.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/swap: Regular page swap optimizations From: Tim Chen To: Andrew Morton Cc: Ying Huang , dave.hansen@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, aaron.lu@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Shaohua Li , Minchan Kim , Rik van Riel , Andrea Arcangeli , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Vladimir Davydov , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Hillf Danton , Christian Borntraeger , Jonathan Corbet Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:40:42 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20161129135012.ec4f6fd238022b76943e9f43@linux-foundation.org> References: <1480367641.3064.33.camel@linux.intel.com> <20161129135012.ec4f6fd238022b76943e9f43@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2 (3.18.5.2-1.fc23) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote: > > > > > > Andrew, > > > > > > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far. > > > Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more__ > > > depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10? > > > Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look. > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Want to give you a ping to see if you can consider merging this series, > > as there are no objections from anyone since its posting 2 weeks ago? > Well, you did say "for 4.10", with which I agree.  So I have them > buffered for processing around the 4.10-rc1 timeframe. > Andrew, We've updated the patchset to v4.   Is there anything we need to modify for the patch set to be  picked up for mm tree? Thanks. Tim