From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751379AbdAOTtk (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:49:40 -0500 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:44182 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751223AbdAOTti (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:49:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1484509776.2405.21.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "scsi: mpt3sas: Fix secure erase premature termination" From: James Bottomley To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Sathya Prakash , Chaitra P B , Suganath Prabu Subramani , Sreekanth Reddy , Hannes Reinecke , linux-scsi , linux-kernel , Thomas Gleixner Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 11:49:36 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1484319727.2527.8.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20170115091925.GA26656@gmail.com> <1484496665.2405.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1484507599.2405.16.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2017-01-15 at 11:41 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:13 AM, James Bottomley > wrote: > > > > Can we compromise on "try not to revert a fix ...". > > No. > > It's about timing, and about how serious the regression is. > > For example, if this happened in rc7, I would have reverted > immediately. No questions asked. > > In this case, the "fix" was was also much less important then the > problem it caused. Some specialized pass-through command not working > right, vs a machine not even booting? There's just no question > what-so-ever. > > So the "fix" you claim just wasn't nearly important enough. It was > also pretty recent and clearly things had worked for _years_ without > it. > > In fact, I'm still somewhat inclined to revert it, just to have a > working rc4 release later today. But I'm hoping maybe Ingo has time > to test things (although I suspect he's already asleep). OK, so the patch to revert would actually be commit 669f044170d8933c3d66d231b69ea97cb8447338 Author: Bart Van Assche Date: Tue Nov 22 16:17:13 2016 -0800 scsi: srp_transport: Move queuecommand() wait code to SCSI core Because that change in the wait code broke the "fix" in mpt3sas. Before that was applied, it actually worked even though I think it's a wrong fix. James