From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752732AbdARSWJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:22:09 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:62970 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752081AbdARSWI (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:22:08 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,249,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="810418766" Message-ID: <1484757114.4497.124.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: x86: Support Turbo Boost Max for non HWP systems From: Srinivas Pandruvada To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Darren Hart , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:31:54 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1484166994-95577-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <20170118003227.GC2599@wisp> <1484699961.3886.42.camel@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 05:24 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 16:32 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:36:34PM -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > intel_bdw_turbo.c > > > CONFIG_INTEL_BDW_TURBO > > We should add _MAX_3 as this is a technology more than simple > > TURBO. > > > > CONFIG_INTEL_BDW_TURBO_MAX_3 > > Would it be re-used in the future? > I would suggest INTEL_TURBO_MAX_3 Current direction is to have ACPI CPPC. I am fine dropping BDW. Let me resubmit patch. Anyway my script missed sending emails to all in the maintainer list, so have to resend. Thanks, Srinivas