From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750840AbdAWKyY (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 05:54:24 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0239.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.239]:33386 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750703AbdAWKyX (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 05:54:23 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1566:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2693:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:4321:5007:7775:10004:10400:10848:11232:11639:11658:11914:12740:12760:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:14659:14721:21080:30054:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:11,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: fruit72_7d36cf4137d55 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1499 Message-ID: <1485168859.12563.29.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Make CodingStyle and SubmittingPatches symlinks From: Joe Perches To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Jonathan Corbet , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 02:54:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <4a5d167c038ac98c51bd034855f1dca9a3e0f6fb.1484086131.git.joe@perches.com> <20170113124135.7873b9c7@lwn.net> <1484337804.3065.36.camel@perches.com> <20170123083458.25b35a4d@vento.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.3-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 11:44 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > When will/can we get rid of them? > Old (doh) kernels, and new versions of stable kernels will keep on having > them for the next +10 years. > > To me, these[*] filenames are more like a user-visible API, which should > not be changed without given consideration. Yup.