From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751496AbdAYJRt (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 04:17:49 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:34538 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751432AbdAYJRr (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 04:17:47 -0500 Message-ID: <1485335859.17709.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: use accessor functions to set sta->_flags From: Johannes Berg To: Amadeusz Slawinski Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:17:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20170125_095558_832079_04D76103) References: <1485272531-11587-1-git-send-email-amadeusz.slawinski@tieto.com> <1485272531-11587-2-git-send-email-amadeusz.slawinski@tieto.com> <1485272668.1236.5.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20170125_095558_832079_04D76103) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 09:55 +0100, Amadeusz Slawinski wrote: > And yes I did. Somehow managed to ignore those warnings though, sorry > about that. :) That was intentional so nobody changing mac80211 in the future will accidentally play with those flags through the normal accessors. > Rechecked with just first patch and it should still be good. Please > ignore this one ;) Yeah, I still have that one pending, no worries :) johannes