From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
james.greenhalgh@arm.com,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: Build failure with v4.9-rc1 and GCC trunk -- compiler weirdness
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 11:04:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485975894.2560.13.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_kifdUOwKgGv1xqboPMjyYRhHwFXDye1HpBo9hQY+_Uw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 18:19 +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 1 February 2017 at 17:36, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> > I still think order_base_2() is broken, since it may invoke
> > roundup_pow_of_two() with an input value that is documented as
> > producing undefined output. I would argue that the below is the
> > correct fix.
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/log2.h b/include/linux/log2.h
> > index fd7ff3d91e6a..46523731bec0 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/log2.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/log2.h
> > @@ -203,6 +203,18 @@ unsigned long __rounddown_pow_of_two(unsigned long n)
> > * ... and so on.
> > */
> >
> > -#define order_base_2(n) ilog2(roundup_pow_of_two(n))
> > +static inline __attribute__((__const__))
> > +unsigned long __order_base_2(unsigned long n)
> > +{
> > + return n ? 1UL << fls_long(n - 1) : 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define order_base_2(n) \
> > +( \
> > + __builtin_constant_p(n) ? ( \
> > + ((n) < 2) ? (n) : \
> > + ilog2((n) - 1) + 1) : \
> > + ilog2(__order_base_2(n)) \
> > + )
> >
> > #endif /* _LINUX_LOG2_H */
>
> Actually, there is a still a redundant shift/fls() in there, this is
> even simpler:
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/log2.h b/include/linux/log2.h
> index fd7ff3d91e6a..4741534bd7af 100644
> --- a/include/linux/log2.h
> +++ b/include/linux/log2.h
> @@ -203,6 +203,18 @@ unsigned long __rounddown_pow_of_two(unsigned long n)
> * ... and so on.
> */
>
> -#define order_base_2(n) ilog2(roundup_pow_of_two(n))
> +static inline __attribute__((__const__))
commonly __attribute_const__
> +unsigned long __order_base_2(unsigned long n)
> +{
> + return n > 1 ? ilog2(n - 1) + 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define order_base_2(n) \
> +( \
> + __builtin_constant_p(n) ? ( \
> + ((n) < 2) ? (n) : \
> + ilog2((n) - 1) + 1) : \
> + __order_base_2(n) \
> + )
Does this work properly when n is a signed negative value?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-01 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-17 18:38 Build failure with v4.9-rc1 and GCC trunk -- compiler weirdness Will Deacon
2016-10-17 19:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 13:35 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-19 14:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 15:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 15:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-19 15:27 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 15:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-19 15:32 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-10-19 15:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-10-19 15:37 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2016-10-19 15:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-19 15:56 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2016-10-19 16:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-19 16:22 ` Will Deacon
2017-02-01 16:58 ` Laura Abbott
2017-02-01 17:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 18:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 19:04 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-02-01 19:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 19:49 ` Joe Perches
2017-02-01 19:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 20:34 ` Joe Perches
2017-02-01 21:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-02 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-01 21:50 ` Laura Abbott
2017-02-02 9:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-02 15:43 ` Laura Abbott
2017-02-02 15:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1485975894.2560.13.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=james.greenhalgh@arm.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).