From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752760AbdBVKIJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 05:08:09 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0170.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.170]:42767 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752519AbdBVKH7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 05:07:59 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:960:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3622:3866:3867:4321:5007:6642:8603:10004:10400:10848:11026:11232:11473:11658:11914:12485:12740:12760:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:14659:14721:14879:21080:30012:30054:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:1,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: frogs97_b2c77d58ec2a X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1459 Message-ID: <1487758075.14159.3.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v2 2/7] staging: most: Using macro DIV_ROUND_UP From: Joe Perches To: Julia Lawall , simran singhal Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 02:07:55 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20170222091015.GA11058@singhal-Inspiron-5558> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.3-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 10:27 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > @@ -117,7 +118,7 @@ static int alloc_dbr(u16 size) > > return DBR_SIZE; /* out of memory */ > > > > for (i = 0; i < DBR_MAP_SIZE; i++) { > > - u32 const blocks = (size + DBR_BLOCK_SIZE - 1) / DBR_BLOCK_SIZE; > > + u32 const blocks = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, DBR_BLOCK_SIZE); > > u32 mask = ~((~(u32)0) << blocks); > > Totally unrelated to DIV_ROUND_UP, would this code be a candidate for > GENMASK? Maybe "(1 << blocks) - 1" would be more intelligible.