From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754704AbdBVM5S (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:57:18 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:64919 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754202AbdBVM5K (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:57:10 -0500 Message-ID: <1487768197.27533.5.camel@gmx.de> Subject: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration From: Mike Galbraith To: Alex Shi Cc: Peter Zijlstra , LKML Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:56:37 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zgoTNoDgmBpg5u7DMAoFnEdTENeMQI/Q+tby/cJfLEq2q+Vubf3 cEmnPydrUtVsEi5RYYjAb+UB82FL4tcAG5v9hNilj/vxz9B3rBesAIrHWk3JGsw8o+yFepV +v/yJnZlsjDZn9kmgQTQBB7EvxRZ9LqCDiuvb52CCiyrqVjG6IvL0VvAIzwQj6pK4JUYGzK CbosOzFUdnTscX285YFuw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:9rVXksy/l48=:V02355qV/Ntq6sgYK16MdC +L/caRfnT0ulLDeObjj1pNdsYzjPZXmwaHv0I6FU89Zltwqhi+qCYb2iPdNkFGrQEV1lF44wI UU8Lkxqh49edAy87fJkzGH/DFTuOLb+ztKVBv6SkmipEi7uT+Mx9/NIrQNCiAPFybpbupa6c+ szbHs+Lg3YrIZMzgulXc4CHimSB2R8UuYLtmy8T2ZqZS3ZCa0vfpkrikHBUpheOmp7TxxS44b AfST0p0kWmuO6mnuGjlTucLOcmMQCTYNP/hLo7fF0NURTio25o+v2yTPJDbB058FPqGTZCB2M UXHqVIhOFOn45//TCTWK1HOSWtf1QhfxfKmZgRharj6yhO/94gZu+hbL7UgQsRauLaNRDSMUw ubEh7TUB9C72skK+4S6WKxRQgBo6Qvhx09Rd2Bbi8SF+vzYDZf0EjokJGWZOoRYGAbXGaQfdI RNKNbYkrLRaX6/RWAdmz17D9zN83MOllxP1JPLJyrTvAfnaHju+RbhhG+iLcMysm6x7ZUbKwi 1u38rCQj2VjYdjlWbdT7pqUKixNnf/zXe1Pi+IDtzqVwujyNi2g6tcj1bUIx4nsZ8HZe/LgrD MTZDkvbe4kE9pfZ4CQwWgUT5w9BhoVTZrdaruZGJO9SNKKRpjQyhpqvE0hksgSHdHCmwwO5GB uVFNTSh5KV6Dh+/B0AUAtRREbUJE2KzjGJp8cnHkeqYK0mjEut2wBbfoP2P/wuIhhHSRC7UWl 38Isqmyh/k4SKy/zfdurskekK+H0Ag96O05QRHpEjsIwfgtq5LySzHiU1Th7B4FuCD9lisVKD PUuHAaN Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Do we really need a spinlock for that in the idle loop? -Mike