From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "paolo.valente@linaro.org" <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: "ulf.hansson@linaro.org" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [WIP PATCHSET 0/4] WIP branch for bfq-mq
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:44:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487961857.2575.8.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62F8F65E-A376-44EB-B53C-C2CFB8F8693F@linaro.org>
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:29 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> thanks for this second attempt of yours. Although, unfortunately, not
> providing some clear indication of the exact cause of your hang (apart
> from a possible deadlock), your log helped me notice another bug.
>
> At any rate, as I have just written to Jens, I have pushed a new
> version of the branch [1] (not just added new commits, but also
> integrated some old commit with new changes, to make it more quickly).
> The branch now contains both a fix for the above bug, and, more
> importantly, a fix for the circular dependencies that were still
> lurking around. Could you please test it?
Hello Paolo,
I have good news: the same test system boots normally with the same
kernel config I used during my previous tests and with the latest
bfq-mq code (commit a965d19585c0) merged with kernel v4.10.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-24 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-07 17:24 [WIP PATCHSET 0/4] WIP branch for bfq-mq Paolo Valente
2017-02-07 17:24 ` [WIP PATCHSET 1/4] blk-mq: pass bio to blk_mq_sched_get_rq_priv Paolo Valente
2017-02-10 16:10 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-07 17:24 ` [WIP PATCHSET 2/4] Move thinktime from bic to bfqq Paolo Valente
2017-02-07 17:24 ` [WIP PATCHSET 3/4] Embed bfq-ioc.c and add locking on request queue Paolo Valente
2017-02-07 17:24 ` [WIP PATCHSET 4/4] Modify interface and operation to comply with blk-mq-sched Paolo Valente
2017-02-10 16:08 ` [WIP PATCHSET 0/4] WIP branch for bfq-mq Bart Van Assche
2017-02-10 16:49 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-10 16:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-10 16:49 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-10 18:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-10 19:49 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-13 21:07 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-13 22:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-13 22:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-22 21:29 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-24 18:44 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-02-25 17:45 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-10 18:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-10 19:33 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-13 21:09 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-13 22:29 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1487961857.2575.8.camel@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox