public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] CPU hotplug updates for 4.9
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:32:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488925949.2739.3.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703071027340.3584@nanos>

On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 10:30 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> That's odd. There was no change related to the hotplug stuff post 4.10
> neither in the core nor in that particular driver.
> 
> I have no immediate clue what to look for aside of asking you whether you
> could do a bisect between 4.10 and 4.11-rc1.

Hello Thomas,

I will keep trying to find the commit that introduced this behavior. The
bisect I ran this morning yielded a commit that only changes ARM code which
does not make sense since I ran the bisect on an x86 system. I guess that
means that during one of the bisect steps I did not wait long enough to see
whether or not the hang occurs and hence that I provided incorrect input to
the bisect process.

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-08  2:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-03 17:37 [GIT pull] CPU hotplug updates for 4.9 Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-07  1:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-07  9:30   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-07 22:32     ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-03-08  8:25       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-08 19:32         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-09 10:22           ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-09 17:20             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-09 17:43               ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-09 22:48                 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-10  7:23                   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-10 17:37                     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-10 21:32                 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-14 15:06   ` [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: Serialize callback invocations proper Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-03-14 17:38     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-14 17:43       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-14 18:25     ` [tip:smp/urgent] " tip-bot for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1488925949.2739.3.camel@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox