From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754581AbdC1PEV (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:04:21 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:18775 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753942AbdC1PEN (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:04:13 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,236,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="241258057" Message-ID: <1490713380.708.32.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral From: Andy Shevchenko To: Linus Walleij , Dmitry Torokhov , Mika Westerberg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:03:00 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <20170323202138.GA11912@dtor-ws> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 15:25 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: > > > If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should > > immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to > > parsing > > unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov > > Can I get some indication from Mika/Rafael/Andy whether this is > correct? While Mika agrees on the change, I would like nevertheless to hear Hans' opinion or even Tested-by tag since it was his fix around those lines. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy