From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754363AbdDDMdR (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 08:33:17 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:31395 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754331AbdDDMdP (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 08:33:15 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,275,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="951560249" Message-ID: <1491309075.708.125.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree From: Andy Shevchenko To: Lee Jones , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:31:15 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170404082156.yhepja5bveahlegr@dell> References: <20170404164453.677dc74a@canb.auug.org.au> <20170404081937.npgk3cwx7bv5igzg@dell> <20170404082156.yhepja5bveahlegr@dell> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 09:21 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi Lee, > > > > > > After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > > > > > /home/sfr/next/next/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c:25:31: > > > fatal error: asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h: No such file or directory > > > > > > Caused by commit > > > > > >   eb2a445f7d8f ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Fix a mess with compilation > > > units") > > > > > > I have reverted that commit for today. > > > > Andy, > > > > I'm pulling this commit.  Despite you thinking the error is > > unrelated > > to your patch, something is clearly wrong and I don't have time to > > investigate. > > > > Ball is in your court. > > Okay, I've had a *very* quick looks. > Seems as if you should be depending on INTEL_PMC_IPC. As a quick fix, yes. As a proper fix the PMC/SCU mess should be fixed in a way to provide a header in include/platform_data/x86. I will prepare v4. Thanks. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy