From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1038940AbdDULlI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:41:08 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38054 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1038804AbdDULlF (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:41:05 -0400
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 59C6B8E68E
Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kraxel@redhat.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 59C6B8E68E
Message-ID: <1492774861.25675.37.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fourcc byteorder: brings header file comments in
 line with reality.
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
        Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>,
        Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>,
        Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= <michel@daenzer.net>,
        Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:41:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20170421110804.GH30290@intel.com>
References: <20170421075825.6307-1-kraxel@redhat.com>
         <20170421092530.GE30290@intel.com> <1492768218.25675.33.camel@redhat.com>
         <20170421110804.GH30290@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:41:05 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

  Hi,

> > I personally find "native" more intuitive, but at the end of the day I
> > don't mind much.  If people prefer "host" over "native" I'll change it.
> 
> "native" to me feels more like "native to the GPU" since these things
> really are tied to the GPU not the CPU.

Ok, then maybe "host" is the better term then, to make clear we talk
about cpu/kernel/userspace byteorder here.

cheers,
  Gerd