From: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Austin Christ <austinwc@codeaurora.org>,
Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH V3 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 13:36:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495136163-27440-2-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495136163-27440-1-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org>
If load_balance() fails to migrate any tasks because all tasks were
affined, load_balance() removes the source cpu from consideration and
attempts to redo and balance among the new subset of cpus.
There is a bug in this code path where the algorithm considers all active
cpus in the system (minus the source that was just masked out). This is
not valid for two reasons: some active cpus may not be in the current
scheduling domain and one of the active cpus is dst_cpu. These cpus should
not be considered, as we cannot pull load from them.
Instead of failing out of load_balance(), we may end up redoing the search
with no valid cpus and incorrectly concluding the domain is balanced.
Additionally, if the group_imbalance flag was just set, it may also be
incorrectly unset, thus the flag will not be seen by other cpus in future
load_balance() runs as that algorithm intends.
Fix the check by removing cpus not in the current domain and the dst_cpu
from considertation, thus limiting the evaluation to valid remaining cpus
from which load might be migrated.
Co-authored-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@codeaurora.org>
Co-authored-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d711093..a5d41b1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8220,7 +8220,24 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
/* All tasks on this runqueue were pinned by CPU affinity */
if (unlikely(env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED)) {
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_of(busiest), cpus);
- if (!cpumask_empty(cpus)) {
+ /*
+ * dst_cpu is not a valid busiest cpu in the following
+ * check since load cannot be pulled from dst_cpu to be
+ * put on dst_cpu.
+ */
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(env.dst_cpu, cpus);
+ /*
+ * Go back to "redo" iff the load-balance cpumask
+ * contains other potential busiest cpus for the
+ * current sched domain.
+ */
+ if (cpumask_intersects(cpus, sched_domain_span(env.sd))) {
+ /*
+ * Now that the check has passed, reenable
+ * dst_cpu so that load can be calculated on
+ * it in the redo path.
+ */
+ cpumask_set_cpu(env.dst_cpu, cpus);
env.loop = 0;
env.loop_break = sched_nr_migrate_break;
goto redo;
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-18 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-18 19:36 [PATCH V3 0/2] load_balance() fixes for affinity Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-18 19:36 ` Jeffrey Hugo [this message]
2017-05-19 13:31 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Dietmar Eggemann
2017-05-22 9:48 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-05-22 19:57 ` Christ, Austin
2017-05-23 11:45 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-05-23 22:05 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-18 19:36 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] sched/fair: Remove group imbalance from calculate_imbalance() Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-22 15:52 ` [PATCH V3 0/2] load_balance() fixes for affinity Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-22 20:17 ` Christ, Austin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1495136163-27440-2-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--to=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=austinwc@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).