From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765561AbdEYMFV (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2017 08:05:21 -0400 Received: from smtprelay2.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:47860 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761413AbdEYMFQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2017 08:05:16 -0400 From: Alexey Brodkin To: "Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com" , "noamca@mellanox.com" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "eladkan@mellanox.com" , "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] ARC: [plat-eznps] Handle memory error as an exception Thread-Topic: [PATCH 10/10] ARC: [plat-eznps] Handle memory error as an exception Thread-Index: AQHS1P+LOC/y0M8+8UyCO0i53555o6IExMEAgAADPQCAAAE9AIAACSmAgAAAaAA= Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 12:05:12 +0000 Message-ID: <1495713912.5393.40.camel@synopsys.com> References: <1495679660-9598-1-git-send-email-noamca@mellanox.com> <1495679660-9598-11-git-send-email-noamca@mellanox.com> <1495710896.5393.32.camel@synopsys.com> <1495711858.5393.37.camel@synopsys.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, ru-RU Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.121.8.122] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <0A73D1DD1BE53F4C8FD655E6FCDBE29D@internal.synopsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id v4PC61Zg027503 Hi Noam, On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 12:03 +0000, Noam Camus wrote: > > > > From: Alexey Brodkin [mailto:Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com]  > > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 14:31 PM > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why don't you just make simulator behaving exactly as your real chip? > > > I can't change simulator core behavior. nSIM is a Synopsys proprietary code. > > > > > Well probably it worth discussing with nSIM team if they may have any suggestions on how to align nSIM behavior with your real HW? > We already talked with them, nothing we can do at this point. > What about turning mem_service into weak symbol and have my own platform copy (just like we do with res_service)? That looks nicer to me. Let's wait for Vineet's opinion on that. -Alexey