From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1948820AbdE0BPb (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2017 21:15:31 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:1112 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S944947AbdEZU5Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2017 16:57:24 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,399,1491289200"; d="scan'208";a="1153328141" Message-ID: <1495832242.79527.1.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: HID: intel_ish-hid: various cleanups From: Srinivas Pandruvada To: Arnd Bergmann , Jiri Kosina Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 13:57:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170518202144.3482304-1-arnd@arndb.de> References: <20170518202144.3482304-1-arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 22:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I ran into a warning message during randconfig testing and spent way > too much time figuring out how to best address it. One thing led to > another and I ended up with a 5 patch series. > > Unforunately I screwed up the first version of the series and > had to replace the first patch, but the second version should > be much better. > > Please have a look at the first patch separately, it might fix an > important bug and need backporting to stable kernels, or it might > only address a harmless warning. This is just addressing some warning. > > For the rest of the patches, please merge for 4.13 unless you > see something wrong. I will ack individual patches as this patch is not 0/5 patch series. Thanks, Srinivas