From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752524AbdFERWq (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:22:46 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:29229 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752255AbdFEQWH (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2017 12:22:07 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,302,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="95775942" Message-ID: <1496679616.22624.16.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI / bus: Switch to use new generic UUID API From: Andy Shevchenko To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J . Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Mika Westerberg , Borislav Petkov , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:20:16 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170605160331.GC29981@lst.de> References: <20170531194152.65927-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20170531194152.65927-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20170605160331.GC29981@lst.de> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 18:03 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > + in_params[0].buffer.pointer = (u8 *)&guid; > > Any idea why the pointer is defined as a u8 * in union acpi_object > instead of a void? I guess this question to Rafael. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy