From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] integrity: get rid of unneeded initializations in integrity_iint_cache entries
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 15:43:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499370226.3130.36.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170706150424.GA21489@mail.hallyn.com>
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 10:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Jeff Layton (jlayton@kernel.org):
> > From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> >
> > The init_once routine memsets the whole object to 0, and then
> > explicitly sets some of the fields to 0 again. Just remove the explicit
> > initializations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Thanks, queued.
Mimi
>
> > ---
> > security/integrity/iint.c | 3 ---
> > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/iint.c b/security/integrity/iint.c
> > index 6fc888ca468e..187b7cb378be 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/iint.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/iint.c
> > @@ -153,14 +153,11 @@ static void init_once(void *foo)
> > struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = foo;
> >
> > memset(iint, 0, sizeof(*iint));
> > - iint->version = 0;
> > - iint->flags = 0UL;
> > iint->ima_file_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> > iint->ima_mmap_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> > iint->ima_bprm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> > iint->ima_read_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> > iint->evm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> > - iint->measured_pcrs = 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int __init integrity_iintcache_init(void)
> > --
> > 2.13.0
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-06 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-06 14:54 [PATCH] integrity: get rid of unneeded initializations in integrity_iint_cache entries Jeff Layton
2017-07-06 15:04 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-07-06 19:43 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2017-12-07 12:01 ` Jeff Layton
2017-12-07 14:35 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-07 15:16 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1499370226.3130.36.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox