public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH V3 0/4]: spmi: pmic-arb: support for V5 HW and bug fixes
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 07:14:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499737497-25649-1-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org> (raw)

v3:
    * spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5
	Modified #define INVALID 	(-1) to
	#define INVALID_EE	0xFF.
	
v2:
    * spmi: pmic-arb: return __iomem pointer instead of offset
      Added Stephen's reviewed-by tag.

    * spmi: pmic-arb: fix a possible null pointer dereference
      Added Stephen's reviewed-by tag.

    * spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5
      Modified the pmic_arb_offset_v5 function to return the offset instead
      of passed by a pointer.

    * spmi: pmic-arb: Remove checking opc value not less than 0
      Added Stephen's reviewed-by tag.
      Added my sign-off tag.

v1:

This patch series add the support for pmic arbiter hardware v5 along with
the few bug fixes and code cleanup.

This patch series is dependent on the below patches and can be merged
cleanly only after picking the below patches in to the tree.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9810723/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9822597/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9822601/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9822607/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9822609/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9822613/

David Collins (1):
  spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5

Fenglin Wu (1):
  spmi: pmic-arb: Remove checking opc value not less than 0

Kiran Gunda (2):
  spmi: pmic-arb: return __iomem pointer instead of offset
  spmi: pmic-arb: fix a possible null pointer dereference

 drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 328 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 268 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
 a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

             reply	other threads:[~2017-07-11  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-11  1:44 Kiran Gunda [this message]
2017-07-11  1:44 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] spmi: pmic-arb: return __iomem pointer instead of offset Kiran Gunda
2017-07-11  1:44 ` [PATCH V3 2/4] spmi: pmic-arb: fix a possible null pointer dereference Kiran Gunda
2017-07-11  1:44 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5 Kiran Gunda
2017-07-14 17:30   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-18  5:09     ` kgunda
2017-07-11  1:44 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] spmi: pmic-arb: Remove checking opc value not less than 0 Kiran Gunda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1499737497-25649-1-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org \
    --to=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox