From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@hotmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com, mykolal@fb.com,
ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_tcp_ca
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 07:22:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14c7dea0-242c-4b47-929c-7cbd1d7e202a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <GV1PR10MB6563A7938B9B403861CA88F3E8B6A@GV1PR10MB6563.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On 11/18/23 1:42 PM, Yuran Pereira wrote:
> bpf_tcp_ca uses the `CHECK` calls even though the use of
> ASSERT_ series of macros is preferred in the bpf selftests.
>
> This patch replaces all `CHECK` calls for equivalent `ASSERT_`
> macro calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@hotmail.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 50 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> index 4aabeaa525d4..6d610b66ec38 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> @@ -20,15 +20,14 @@
>
> static const unsigned int total_bytes = 10 * 1024 * 1024;
> static int expected_stg = 0xeB9F;
> -static int stop, duration;
> +static int stop;
>
> [...]
> @@ -108,26 +107,27 @@ static void do_test(const char *tcp_ca, const struct bpf_map *sk_stg_map)
> sa6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
> sa6.sin6_addr = in6addr_loopback;
> err = bind(lfd, (struct sockaddr *)&sa6, addrlen);
> - if (CHECK(err == -1, "bind", "errno:%d\n", errno))
> + if (!ASSERT_NEQ(err, -1, "bind"))
> goto done;
> +
> err = getsockname(lfd, (struct sockaddr *)&sa6, &addrlen);
> - if (CHECK(err == -1, "getsockname", "errno:%d\n", errno))
> + if (!ASSERT_NEQ(err, -1, "getsockname"))
> goto done;
> +
> err = listen(lfd, 1);
> - if (CHECK(err == -1, "listen", "errno:%d\n", errno))
> + if (!ASSERT_NEQ(err, -1, "listen"))
> goto done;
>
> if (sk_stg_map) {
> err = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(sk_stg_map), &fd,
> &expected_stg, BPF_NOEXIST);
> - if (CHECK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(sk_stg_map)",
> - "err:%d errno:%d\n", err, errno))
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(sk_stg_map)"))
> goto done;
> }
>
> /* connect to server */
> err = connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&sa6, addrlen);
> - if (CHECK(err == -1, "connect", "errno:%d\n", errno))
> + if (!ASSERT_NEQ(err, -1, "connect"))
> goto done;
>
> if (sk_stg_map) {
> @@ -135,14 +135,13 @@ static void do_test(const char *tcp_ca, const struct bpf_map *sk_stg_map)
>
> err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(sk_stg_map), &fd,
> &tmp_stg);
> - if (CHECK(!err || errno != ENOENT,
> - "bpf_map_lookup_elem(sk_stg_map)",
> - "err:%d errno:%d\n", err, errno))
> + if (!ASSERT_NEQ(err, 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem(sk_stg_map)") ||
!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem(sk_stg_map)")
might be simpler than !ASSERT_NEQ(..).
> + !ASSERT_EQ(errno, ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_elem(sk_stg_map)"))
> goto done;
> }
>
> err = pthread_create(&srv_thread, NULL, server, (void *)(long)lfd);
> - if (CHECK(err != 0, "pthread_create", "err:%d errno:%d\n", err, errno))
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create"))
> goto done;
>
> /* recv total_bytes */
> @@ -156,13 +155,12 @@ static void do_test(const char *tcp_ca, const struct bpf_map *sk_stg_map)
> bytes += nr_recv;
> }
>
> - CHECK(bytes != total_bytes, "recv", "%zd != %u nr_recv:%zd errno:%d\n",
> - bytes, total_bytes, nr_recv, errno);
> + ASSERT_EQ(bytes, total_bytes, "recv");
>
> WRITE_ONCE(stop, 1);
> - pthread_join(srv_thread, &thread_ret);
> - CHECK(IS_ERR(thread_ret), "pthread_join", "thread_ret:%ld",
> - PTR_ERR(thread_ret));
> + err = pthread_join(srv_thread, &thread_ret);
> + ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_join");
The above is not equivalent to the original code.
The original didn't check pthread_join() return as it
is very very unlikely to fail. And check 'thread_ret'
is still needed.
> +
> done:
> close(lfd);
> close(fd);
> @@ -174,7 +172,7 @@ static void test_cubic(void)
> struct bpf_link *link;
>
> cubic_skel = bpf_cubic__open_and_load();
> - if (CHECK(!cubic_skel, "bpf_cubic__open_and_load", "failed\n"))
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(cubic_skel, "bpf_cubic__open_and_load"))
> return;
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-20 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-18 18:40 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] selftests/bpf: Update multiple prog_tests to use ASSERT_ macros Yuran Pereira
2023-11-18 18:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_tcp_ca Yuran Pereira
2023-11-20 15:22 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2023-11-20 17:15 ` Yuran Pereira
2023-11-20 19:00 ` Yonghong Song
2023-11-18 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bind_perm Yuran Pereira
2023-11-20 15:24 ` Yonghong Song
2023-11-18 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_obj_id Yuran Pereira
2023-11-20 15:41 ` Yonghong Song
2023-11-18 18:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in vmlinux Yuran Pereira
2023-11-20 15:44 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14c7dea0-242c-4b47-929c-7cbd1d7e202a@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yuran.pereira@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox