From: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH V4 0/4]: spmi: pmic-arb: support for V5 HW and bug fixes
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:51:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500373265-12875-1-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org> (raw)
v4:
* spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5
Clean-up as per Stephen's comments
v3:
* spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5
Modified #define INVALID (-1) to
#define INVALID_EE 0xFF.
v2:
* spmi: pmic-arb: return __iomem pointer instead of offset
Added Stephen's reviewed-by tag.
* spmi: pmic-arb: fix a possible null pointer dereference
Added Stephen's reviewed-by tag.
* spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5
Modified the pmic_arb_offset_v5 function to return the offset instead
of passed by a pointer.
* spmi: pmic-arb: Remove checking opc value not less than 0
Added Stephen's reviewed-by tag.
Added my sign-off tag.
v1:
This patch series add the support for pmic arbiter hardware v5 along with
the few bug fixes and code cleanup.
This patch series is dependent on the below patches and can be merged
cleanly only after picking the below patches in to the tree.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9810723/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9822597/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9822601/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9822607/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9822609/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9822613/
David Collins (1):
spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5
Fenglin Wu (1):
spmi: pmic-arb: Remove checking opc value not less than 0
Kiran Gunda (2):
spmi: pmic-arb: return __iomem pointer instead of offset
spmi: pmic-arb: fix a possible null pointer dereference
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 331 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 266 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next reply other threads:[~2017-07-18 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-18 10:21 Kiran Gunda [this message]
2017-07-18 10:21 ` [PATCH V4 1/4] spmi: pmic-arb: return __iomem pointer instead of offset Kiran Gunda
2017-07-18 10:21 ` [PATCH V4 2/4] spmi: pmic-arb: fix a possible null pointer dereference Kiran Gunda
2017-07-18 10:21 ` [PATCH V4 3/4] spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5 Kiran Gunda
2017-07-18 22:47 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-18 10:21 ` [PATCH V4 4/4] spmi: pmic-arb: Remove checking opc value not less than 0 Kiran Gunda
2017-07-18 22:17 ` [PATCH V4 0/4]: spmi: pmic-arb: support for V5 HW and bug fixes Stephen Boyd
2017-07-20 6:50 ` kgunda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1500373265-12875-1-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org \
--to=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).