From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752162AbdHHPwu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2017 11:52:50 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0216.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.216]:53574 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752014AbdHHPws (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2017 11:52:48 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2693:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3351:3622:3865:3867:3868:3871:3872:3873:3874:4321:5007:7576:10004:10400:10848:11026:11232:11658:11914:12043:12295:12296:12740:12760:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:14181:14659:14721:21080:21627:30054:30070:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: rose88_5250c07ff1f3f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1906 Message-ID: <1502207564.2219.35.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: Fix coding style violations From: Joe Perches To: Michal Simek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu Cc: Sai Krishna Potthuri , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F6ren?= Brinkmann , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Jonathan Cameron , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 08:52:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 14:04 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > From: Sai Krishna Potthuri [] > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc.h b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc.h [] > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ struct xadc_ops { > int (*setup)(struct platform_device *pdev, struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > int irq); > void (*update_alarm)(struct xadc *, unsigned int); > - unsigned long (*get_dclk_rate)(struct xadc *); > + unsigned long (*get_dclk_rate)(struct xadc *xadc); > irqreturn_t (*interrupt_handler)(int, void *); Doesn't it seem odd to you that the lines above and below have the same form? checkpatch is an imperfect tool. It will always be imperfect. Please use your eyes and mind too.