From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (mailout.nod.at [116.203.167.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52223379991 for ; Fri, 15 May 2026 06:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.167.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778825908; cv=none; b=IsjLFyowakBh9cTvbNn/bpXWjJLfqmFy3HUlkOM2nKvCOLLAZwHB3rBO+7xvpsZugPzoQopCJaMA9Seu1SM/VkzxupBljx7LvicUB21gZd+Ee2XoacczMpQ9UepVz/HUbPgbeNyEHnTjUerZKAE/AXjLszUE0cNqGHSSGyHlFOU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778825908; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GAXdydLRYdCcNhpEnRDl99MSa9qmxa2x3zCfEnih0wk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AackeiRFGkeJpjEfsNSCImOBqqWnOpmhL/6ybET8ReFHFCr4/wyPUkIJD/IIX/4HUSrds8aSfCMD0cGDx313oo7weR33l2OxEAbaT8J6JHcJHC5jmsa1+TU8yveu66DgMXF/N+TGk0NJPu3F/1CRoqAMU6U9ChlSbS4WXAV+Rv4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nod.at; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.167.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nod.at Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id E536A298580; Fri, 15 May 2026 08:18:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id GbWG7iY69rsj; Fri, 15 May 2026 08:18:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CA7298599; Fri, 15 May 2026 08:18:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id YqesLGYRfQSw; Fri, 15 May 2026 08:18:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (lithops.sigma-star.at [195.201.40.130]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B79298580; Fri, 15 May 2026 08:18:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 08:18:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Weinberger To: Sohil Mehta Cc: dave hansen , bp , x86 , Thomas Gleixner , mingo , hpa , Josh Poimboeuf , andrew cooper3 , Tony Luck , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , linux-kernel Message-ID: <1502416086.3154.1778825895775.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> In-Reply-To: <20260515002500.2463393-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com> References: <20260515002500.2463393-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Fix a F00F bug warning and cleanup surrounding code Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3807 (ZimbraWebClient - FF150 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3809) Thread-Topic: x86: Fix a F00F bug warning and cleanup surrounding code Thread-Index: up0MdB85kGWedIZCzqEQEy+C4XVY8A== ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Sohil Mehta" > This is an iteration of the series posted earlier by Richard Weinberger. > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260216104343.3625292-1-richard@nod.at/ >=20 > The patches primarily fix a harmless "alternatives_patched" warning that > affects the original Pentium (Family 5) processors with SMP. In this > revision, I reworded the commit messages and added a patch to simplify > the warning logic for the F00F bug. The patches seemed worth reposting > because the scope of the change is limited and it reduces lines of code. >=20 > The series is split into three patches for easier review. Let me know if > it would be preferable to merge them. Also, I wasn't sure whether the Fix= es > tag in patch 1 is necessary. I left it inplace as Richard had it in his > original series, but it can be removed to avoid backporting hassles. >=20 > Richard Weinberger (2): > x86/cpu/intel: Don't clear X86_BUG_F00F before setting it > x86/cpufeature: Remove clear_cpu_bug() >=20 > Sohil Mehta (1): > x86/cpu/intel: Simplify F00F bug notice using pr_notice_once() Thanks for reviving these patches! //richard