From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752114AbdHMOQA (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2017 10:16:00 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:60271 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750942AbdHMOP6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2017 10:15:58 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,368,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="1162169282" Message-ID: <1502633755.15214.4.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] platform/x86: wmi: Switch to use new generic UUID API From: Andy Shevchenko To: Andy Lutomirski , Andy Shevchenko Cc: Darren Hart , Platform Driver , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 17:15:55 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <20170802132834.8223-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 08:43 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Andy Lutomirski > > wrote: > > > > On Aug 2, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Andy Shevchenko > > > inux.intel.com> wrote: > > > NAK.  guid_block is a firmware interface, so opaque kernel types > > > don't > > > belong in it. > > > > I f we leave this, what do you think about everything else? > > Assuming it works, it's fine with me.  I'd be happy to test. Just sent v2. > Keep in mind that this beast is a *little-endian* GUID abomination, > and I don't see generic conversion helpers.  Something might need to > be added. Do you mean something like char16_to_guid() / char16_to_uuid() ? -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy