From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: Anton Volkov <avolkov@ispras.ru>,
johan@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
wsa-dev@sang-engineering.com
Cc: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>,
ldv-project@linuxtesting.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible null pointer dereference in adutux.ko
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:20:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502803217.6606.3.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc719c9c-db6a-9254-2d6d-918946c5a18d@ispras.ru>
Am Dienstag, den 15.08.2017, 15:59 +0300 schrieb Anton Volkov:
> Hello.
>
> While searching for races in the Linux kernel I've come across
> "drivers/usb/misc/adutux.ko" module. Here is a question that I came up
> with while analyzing results. Lines are given using the info from Linux
> v4.12.
>
> Consider the following case:
>
> Thread 1: Thread 2:
> adu_release
> ->adu_release_internal adu_disconnect
> <READ &dev->udev->dev> dev->udev = NULL
> (adutux.c: line 298) (adutux.c: line 771)
> usb_deregister_dev
>
> Comments in the source code point at the possibility of adu_release()
> being called separately from adu_disconnect(). adu_release() and
> adu_disconnect() acquire different mutexes, so they are not protected
> from one another. If adu_disconnect() changes dev->udev before its value
> is read in adu_release_internal() there will be a NULL pointer
> dereference on a read attempt. Is this case feasible from your point of
> view?
>
> Thank you for your time.
Hi,
your analysis seems correct to me. In fact it looks like
66d4bc30d128e7c7ac4cf64aa78cb76e971cec5b
USB: adutux: remove custom debug macro
more or less broke disconnect on this driver
(the URBs can also finish after dev->udev = NULL)
Do you want to do a fix or do you want me to do it?
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-15 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-15 12:59 Possible null pointer dereference in adutux.ko Anton Volkov
2017-08-15 13:20 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2017-08-15 13:38 ` Anton Volkov
2017-08-15 15:58 ` Oliver Neukum
2017-08-18 15:04 ` Anton Volkov
2017-08-28 12:09 ` Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1502803217.6606.3.camel@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=avolkov@ispras.ru \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
--cc=ldv-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa-dev@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox