From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC 00/12] Introduce housekeeping subsystem v2
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 03:50:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503453071-952-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
So after the feedback from the v1, I decided to take it one step further
and propose to re-implement isolcpus= on top of housekeeping. I expect
it to be controversial because it brings a behaviour change: isolcpus=
won't disable load balancing anymore. So you change the affinity of a
task at your own risk. OTOH it might make the implementation of isolcpus
more extendable, maybe more acceptable for a cpuset interface. I
leave you judge.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
core/isolation-v2
HEAD: 79ef9a911551a4f700b057ed794c223bd3a97d7b
Thanks,
Frederic
---
Frederic Weisbecker (12):
housekeeping: Move housekeeping related code to its own file
watchdog: Use housekeeping_cpumask() instead of ad-hoc version
housekeeping: Provide a dynamic off-case to housekeeping_any_cpu()
housekeeping: Make housekeeping cpumask private
housekeeping: Use its own static key
housekeeping: Rename is_housekeeping_cpu to housekeeping_cpu
housekeeping: Move it under own config, independant from NO_HZ
housekeeping: Introduce housekeeping flags
workqueue: Affine unbound workqueues to housekeeping cpumask
housekeeping: Affine unbound kthreads
housekeeping: Handle nohz_full= parameter
housekeeping: Reimplement isolcpus on housekeeping
drivers/base/cpu.c | 10 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/tile/tilegx.c | 6 +-
include/linux/housekeeping.h | 52 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/sched.h | 2 -
include/linux/tick.h | 38 +----------
init/Kconfig | 7 +++
init/main.c | 2 +
kernel/Makefile | 1 +
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 13 +---
kernel/housekeeping.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/kthread.c | 5 +-
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 3 +-
kernel/rcu/update.c | 3 +-
kernel/sched/core.c | 25 ++------
kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +-
kernel/sched/topology.c | 19 +-----
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 31 +--------
kernel/watchdog.c | 13 ++--
kernel/workqueue.c | 3 +-
19 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 1:50 Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] housekeeping: Move housekeeping related code to its own file Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-31 20:16 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-31 22:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] watchdog: Use housekeeping_cpumask() instead of ad-hoc version Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] housekeeping: Provide a dynamic off-case to housekeeping_any_cpu() Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] housekeeping: Make housekeeping cpumask private Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] housekeeping: Use its own static key Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] housekeeping: Rename is_housekeeping_cpu to housekeeping_cpu Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] housekeeping: Move it under own config, independant from NO_HZ Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] housekeeping: Introduce housekeeping flags Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] workqueue: Affine unbound workqueues to housekeeping cpumask Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] housekeeping: Affine unbound kthreads Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] housekeeping: Handle nohz_full= parameter Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] housekeeping: Reimplement isolcpus on housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 14:55 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-24 13:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 15:38 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-28 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 13:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 15:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 16:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 16:53 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-28 17:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-31 18:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-31 23:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1503453071-952-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox