public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 05/12] housekeeping: Use its own static key
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 03:51:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503453071-952-6-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503453071-952-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>

Housekeeping code still depends on nohz_full static key. Since we want
to decouple housekeeping from nohz, let's create a housekeeping own static
key. It's mostly relevant for calls to is_housekeeping_cpu() from the
scheduler.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/housekeeping.h |  3 ++-
 kernel/housekeeping.c        | 14 +++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/housekeeping.h b/include/linux/housekeeping.h
index 31a1401..cbe8d63 100644
--- a/include/linux/housekeeping.h
+++ b/include/linux/housekeeping.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/tick.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(housekeeping_overriden);
 extern int housekeeping_any_cpu(void);
 extern const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(void);
 extern void housekeeping_affine(struct task_struct *t);
@@ -31,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void housekeeping_init(void) { }
 static inline bool is_housekeeping_cpu(int cpu)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
-	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
 		return housekeeping_test_cpu(cpu);
 #endif
 	return true;
diff --git a/kernel/housekeeping.c b/kernel/housekeeping.c
index 0183e75..f8be7e6 100644
--- a/kernel/housekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/housekeeping.c
@@ -9,12 +9,15 @@
 #include <linux/housekeeping.h>
 #include <linux/tick.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/static_key.h>
 
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(housekeeping_overriden);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_overriden);
 static cpumask_var_t housekeeping_mask;
 
 int housekeeping_any_cpu(void)
 {
-	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
 		return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping_mask, cpu_online_mask);
 
 	return smp_processor_id();
@@ -22,7 +25,7 @@ int housekeeping_any_cpu(void)
 
 const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(void)
 {
-	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
 		return housekeeping_mask;
 
 	return cpu_possible_mask;
@@ -30,19 +33,18 @@ const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(void)
 
 void housekeeping_affine(struct task_struct *t)
 {
-	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
 		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, housekeeping_mask);
 }
 
 bool housekeeping_test_cpu(int cpu)
 {
-	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
 		return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, housekeeping_mask);
 
 	return true;
 }
 
-
 void __init housekeeping_init(void)
 {
 	if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
@@ -58,6 +60,8 @@ void __init housekeeping_init(void)
 	cpumask_andnot(housekeeping_mask,
 		       cpu_possible_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
 
+	static_branch_enable(&housekeeping_overriden);
+
 	/* We need at least one CPU to handle housekeeping work */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(housekeeping_mask));
 }
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-23  1:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23  1:50 [RFC 00/12] Introduce housekeeping subsystem v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] housekeeping: Move housekeeping related code to its own file Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-31 20:16   ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-31 22:58     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] watchdog: Use housekeeping_cpumask() instead of ad-hoc version Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] housekeeping: Provide a dynamic off-case to housekeeping_any_cpu() Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] housekeeping: Make housekeeping cpumask private Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] housekeeping: Rename is_housekeeping_cpu to housekeeping_cpu Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] housekeeping: Move it under own config, independant from NO_HZ Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] housekeeping: Introduce housekeeping flags Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] workqueue: Affine unbound workqueues to housekeeping cpumask Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] housekeeping: Affine unbound kthreads Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] housekeeping: Handle nohz_full= parameter Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] housekeeping: Reimplement isolcpus on housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 14:55   ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-24 13:19     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 10:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 15:38       ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-28 10:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 13:23     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 13:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 15:27         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 16:24           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 16:53             ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-28 17:33             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-31 18:53               ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-31 23:00                 ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1503453071-952-6-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox