public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: "Suzuki Takashi" <suzuki.takashi@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-am33-list] [PATCH 2/2] MN10300: Add the MN10300/AM33 architecture to the kernel [try #2]
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:38:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15038.1194277085@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1c6420f0711030907g10149e1asda1afe4e2f3c8e02@mail.gmail.com>

Suzuki Takashi <suzuki.takashi@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm very annoyed and a bit surprised to hear they admitted such a big
> change so easily.

Why be annoyed?  It's not actually a substantial change.

> You and I know there are consumer devices already out running the am33
> port of the kernel.

Yes, and have been for years, I suspect.

> What triggered me to comment on your patch was that its directory and file
> structure is very different from the ones there.  There are no cpu-, proc-
> and unit- directories and no names with mn103e10_* there.

Things are allowed to change.

> The kernels there seem to be already running on several processors,
> some of which are with AM34 cores that you concern about, according to
> the #ifdefs there.

Yes.

> > The problem is how much?  I could just move all the cpu-am33v2/ files into
> > the dir above, but what happens if an incompatible CPU core is introduced?
> 
> How does your client say?

MEI have agreed for me to do that.  I can always undo it later if sufficiently
incompatible CPU cores arise that warrant that level of segregation.

David

      reply	other threads:[~2007-11-05 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-29 12:27 [PATCH 0/2] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to Linux kernel [try #2] David Howells
2007-10-29 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] MN10300: Suppress AOUT library support in ELF binfmt if !CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT " David Howells
2007-10-30 12:57 ` [Linux-am33-list] [PATCH 0/2] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to Linux kernel " Suzuki Takashi
2007-10-30 14:14   ` David Howells
2007-10-30 15:10     ` Suzuki Takashi
2007-10-30 16:53       ` David Howells
2007-10-30 17:47         ` DJ Delorie
2007-10-30 21:59         ` Suzuki Takashi
2007-10-30 23:06           ` David Howells
2007-10-31 10:50             ` Alan Cox
2007-11-02 15:19             ` Suzuki Takashi
     [not found] ` <20071029122809.2846.58795.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
2007-10-30 14:40   ` [Linux-am33-list] [PATCH 2/2] MN10300: Add the MN10300/AM33 architecture to the " Suzuki Takashi
2007-10-30 20:04     ` David Howells
2007-10-31  0:03       ` Suzuki Takashi
2007-10-31 11:46         ` David Howells
2007-11-03 16:07           ` Suzuki Takashi
2007-11-05 15:38             ` David Howells [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15038.1194277085@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.takashi@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox