From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751213AbdH1Gsh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 28 Aug 2017 02:48:37 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:63473 "EHLO mout.gmx.net"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750865AbdH1Gsg (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 28 Aug 2017 02:48:36 -0400
Message-ID: <1503902870.6028.39.camel@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT] sched/fair: Improve the behavior of sync flag
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
        Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>,
        Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:47:50 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1503900623.6028.33.camel@gmx.de>
References: <20170827010226.19703-1-joelaf@google.com>
         <1503812659.7566.43.camel@gmx.de> <1503814090.7566.50.camel@gmx.de>
         <CAJWu+orjvXBgAYnpnn-9xoYW53+cB7g4yeK5-9dw8aAaJKCHOg@mail.gmail.com>
         <1503857277.9136.67.camel@gmx.de>
         <CAJWu+oqSjHFN3nBDJAQanERxxuqQdcer=JvjjuS59B4U_VWstg@mail.gmail.com>
         <1503900623.6028.33.camel@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zMS/PGSTP6LFN0IUvEJier1ecrTuzPb+/fQ/26LrOfSQzQZAGI8
 wIQSIs1XelNJveZvx47ZN4nI+vOsz0WwBpkxlBYmfZdECpMnfvtOVUlSdeCZut5ZHWxt10B
 5FtLc4I2Ux4WphQpDJNW9vjWRc0XZYUcZhgYZThvOHMmFSTejrx81gFzEGLbqBW/LNR8ODC
 DsoyKhRliaqYYCie8QXfA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:SOTVKFLuFr0=:zvdqIe5vLPO7BD1C3KHbIA
 QZ9G3Rt2caxpuLL68QCrFQOp5bTR/LNCFnXomvaRu0hRmaKQH3Q+dNL2I/LbD6UPiOQb65prM
 3bSfq2rkXAviJdEltnWDd0Fp5YIcf1qJfagNy/Uk3q2fUl6Npofmzk/+UXxtBteV8KgJDMWNT
 ijHc6JTtNUO7/dtsGO5LoCCtu4UUSGeNxGocGHnxhW3XwKtybNyrgM+y/6e3/gW00eW6Hjnib
 pAUmmtIqxKCF7riXm+S30qObxLlOCi2w3eIvdYrPTlapD+wg9HY08JhSj4Oki/VDZxKS2+raA
 cIiFoH5ihZhyFcKE/7ppy5K3wO2gRcaWvMKo4I6crCpHdWH8jOX0scfESUjChbFvBAj4aUBja
 iP4vJCFECEOba++9nDtRh2moJXza0Oi6MdEaWWQOAHttqbL92l2rjdHXZJG5ou2v1stumHpHj
 hFLgVo6vGqGVeFm0SdMKFq+L9YzE+ssjcDp+5PeWQaNVyD2Khg3uTwDprX1+9Upc2PW5cCg5Z
 719RKYnH9XwlGM4DDwTYRDKTWZrXty8y3bjiknDH75UEi9qXFRBfYFEYwBxiIGuEI/TcpUad2
 KNHT3gOqLdlJPf1FQEZ2OyCux2BRdaNHf4K5o4WYhuXsYcr6P9DdCErJdotNNLsUESV/Om67Z
 zzF3JF6m3DV3Z76ors+bKqztZNkmY17cgQbMgwQUgSYdfWrTA/+zLX4I+WH3k50TX2BgBA4ek
 FAoAFMpiipwQCeFQ5srRjuUwqQdrprtGKG4POP7ColBfPAxzzKFHcpHl3HZjk/PSMMBb0Wm2h
 E3uSWPp6YCWH+5Evcl9BYBLGQb8q1ZHbrjqX6HE8SDIH7A2+wI=
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 08:10 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Iff deeper cstate etc for
> longer does make a big difference, I can imagine wakeup time migrate
> leftward if capacity exists as an "on battery" tactic. (though that
> thought also invokes some unpleasant bounce fest images)

(consolidate left would have to be LB global to avoid fight with self)