[PATCH V2 5/5] perf test: add test case for PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR

[kan.liang@intel.com]

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>

Extend sample-parsing test cases to support new sample type
PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
index 6d028f4..c385848 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
@@ -141,6 +141,9 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR)
+		COMP(phys_addr);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -206,6 +209,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
 			.mask	= sample_regs,
 			.regs	= regs,
 		},
+		.phys_addr	= 113,
 	};
 	struct sample_read_value values[] = {{1, 5}, {9, 3}, {2, 7}, {6, 4},};
 	struct perf_sample sample_out;
@@ -305,7 +309,7 @@ int test__sample_parsing(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
 	 * were added.  Please actually update the test rather than just change
 	 * the condition below.
 	 */
-	if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR << 1) {
+	if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR << 1) {
 		pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
-- 
2.4.3