The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
	Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>,
	Nathan Howard <liverlint@gmail.com>,
	Adan Hawthorn <adanhawthorn@gmail.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/28] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.index if its value is 100b and ModRM.mod is not 11b
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 10:19:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1504372784.19040.1.camel@ranerica-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170831193824.volcxn4i2fmpdtiq@pd.tnic>

On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 21:38 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 05:27:47PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Section 2.2.1.2 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> > Developer's Manual volume 2A states that when ModRM.mod !=11b and
> > ModRM.rm = 100b indexed register-indirect addressing is used. In other
> > words, a SIB byte follows the ModRM byte. In the specific case of
> > SIB.index = 100b, the scale*index portion of the computation of the
> > effective address is null. To signal callers of this particular situation,
> > get_reg_offset() can return -EDOM (-EINVAL continues to indicate that an
> > error when decoding the SIB byte).
> > 
> > An example of this situation can be the following instruction:
> > 
> >    8b 4c 23 80       mov -0x80(%rbx,%riz,1),%rcx
> >    ModRM:            0x4c [mod:1b][reg:1b][rm:100b]
> >    SIB:              0x23 [scale:0b][index:100b][base:11b]
> >    Displacement:     0x80  (1-byte, as per ModRM.mod = 1b)
> > 
> > The %riz 'register' indicates a null index.
> > 
> > In long mode, a REX prefix may be used. When a REX prefix is present,
> > REX.X adds a fourth bit to the register selection of SIB.index. This gives
> > the ability to refer to all the 16 general purpose registers. When REX.X is
> > 1b and SIB.index is 100b, the index is indicated in %r12. In our example,
> > this would look like:
> > 
> >    42 8b 4c 23 80    mov -0x80(%rbx,%r12,1),%rcx
> >    REX:              0x42 [W:0b][R:0b][X:1b][B:0b]
> >    ModRM:            0x4c [mod:1b][reg:1b][rm:100b]
> >    SIB:              0x23 [scale:0b][.X: 1b, index:100b][.B:0b, base:11b]
> >    Displacement:     0x80  (1-byte, as per ModRM.mod = 1b)
> > 
> > %r12 is a valid register to use in the scale*index part of the effective
> > address computation.
> > 
> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Nathan Howard <liverlint@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Adan Hawthorn <adanhawthorn@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> > Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
> > Cc: x86@kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/mm/mpx.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

Thanks for your review!

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-02 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-19  0:27 [PATCH v8 00/28] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 01/28] x86/mm: Relocate page fault error codes to traps.h Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 02/28] x86/boot: Relocate definition of the initial state of CR0 Ricardo Neri
2017-08-25 17:41   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-31  4:04     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-31  9:51       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-02 17:35         ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 03/28] ptrace,x86: Make user_64bit_mode() available to 32-bit builds Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 04/28] uprobes/x86: Use existing definitions for segment override prefixes Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 05/28] x86/mpx: Use signed variables to compute effective addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-08-29 16:09   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-31  4:19     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-31  9:52       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 06/28] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.index if its value is 100b and ModRM.mod is not 11b Ricardo Neri
2017-08-31 19:38   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-02 17:19     ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 07/28] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.base if its value is 101b and ModRM.mod = 0 Ricardo Neri
2017-09-06 15:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 08/28] x86/mpx, x86/insn: Relocate insn util functions to a new insn-eval file Ricardo Neri
2017-09-06 15:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-06 19:27     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 09/28] x86/insn-eval: Do not BUG on invalid register type Ricardo Neri
2017-09-07 17:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-07 20:27     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 10/28] x86/insn-eval: Add a utility function to get register offsets Ricardo Neri
2017-09-08 13:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-14 18:30     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 11/28] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to identify string instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-09-08 13:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-14 18:30     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 12/28] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector Ricardo Neri
2017-09-26 10:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27  4:21     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-09-27 11:47       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 22:32         ` Ricardo Neri
2017-09-28  9:36           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29  6:06             ` Ricardo Neri
2017-09-29 11:56               ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-04 16:47                 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 13/28] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor Ricardo Neri
2017-09-26 18:05   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 17:39     ` Neri, Ricardo
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 14/28] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment descriptor base address and limit Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 15/28] x86/insn-eval: Add function to get default params of code segment Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 16/28] x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement if ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 101b Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 17/28] x86/insn-eval: Incorporate segment base in linear address computation Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:27 ` [PATCH v8 18/28] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 32-bit address encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:28 ` [PATCH v8 19/28] x86/insn-eval: Add wrapper function for 32 and 64-bit addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:28 ` [PATCH v8 20/28] x86/insn-eval: Handle 32-bit address encodings in virtual-8086 mode Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:28 ` [PATCH v8 21/28] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 16-bit addressing encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:28 ` [PATCH v8 22/28] x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitions Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:28 ` [PATCH v8 23/28] x86: Add emulation code for UMIP instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:28 ` [PATCH v8 24/28] x86/umip: Force a page fault when unable to copy emulated result to user Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:28 ` [PATCH v8 25/28] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:28 ` [PATCH v8 26/28] x86/traps: Fixup general protection faults caused by UMIP Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:28 ` [PATCH v8 27/28] selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-08-19  0:28 ` [PATCH v8 28/28] selftests/x86: Add tests for instruction str and sldt Ricardo Neri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1504372784.19040.1.camel@ranerica-desktop \
    --to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=adam.buchbinder@gmail.com \
    --cc=adanhawthorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liverlint@gmail.com \
    --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox