public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netlink: do not set cb_running if dump's start() errs
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 14:27:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507552064.26041.50.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507550326.26041.39.camel@sipsolutions.net>

Just decided to take another look:

On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 13:58 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 13:56 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> 
> > @@ -2266,16 +2266,17 @@ int __netlink_dump_start(struct sock *ssk,
> > struct sk_buff *skb,
> >  	cb->min_dump_alloc = control->min_dump_alloc;
> >  	cb->skb = skb;
> >  
> > +	if (cb->start) {
> > +		ret = cb->start(cb);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto error_unlock;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	nlk->cb_running = true;
> >  
> >  	mutex_unlock(nlk->cb_mutex);
> 
> Hmm. Now start is invoked with the mutex held, I'm not sure it
> actually _matters_, but that should probably be reviewed and
> mentioned in the commit log?

It sort of seems designed to run ->start outside the lock, otherwise we
wouldn't really have to acquire it again in netlink_dump() but could
just keep it across the call (with some locking changes in
netlink_recvmsg())?

Then again, clearly none of the (few) existing users actually care.

Btw - we should (separately) also remove "start" from struct
netlink_callback, it's only ever used within this function and we can
use control->start instead of cb->start here.

johannes

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-09 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-09 11:56 [PATCH] netlink: do not set cb_running if dump's start() errs Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-09 11:57 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-09 11:58 ` Johannes Berg
2017-10-09 12:12   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-09 12:14     ` [PATCH v2] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-09 12:31       ` Johannes Berg
2017-10-09 17:02         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-09 17:29       ` David Miller
2017-10-09 12:27   ` Johannes Berg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1507552064.26041.50.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox