From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: tj@kernel.org, johannes.berg@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, oleg@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] lockdep: Remove unnecessary acquisitions wrt workqueue flush
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:51:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507618297-27470-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507618297-27470-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
The workqueue added manual acquisitions to catch deadlock cases.
Now crossrelease was introduced, some of those are redundant, since
wait_for_completion() already includes the acquisition for itself.
Removed it.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
include/linux/workqueue.h | 4 ++--
kernel/workqueue.c | 20 ++++----------------
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index db6dc9d..1bef13e 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static inline void destroy_delayed_work_on_stack(struct delayed_work *work) { }
\
__init_work((_work), _onstack); \
(_work)->data = (atomic_long_t) WORK_DATA_INIT(); \
- lockdep_init_map(&(_work)->lockdep_map, #_work, &__key, 0); \
+ lockdep_init_map(&(_work)->lockdep_map, "(complete)"#_work, &__key, 0); \
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(_work)->entry); \
(_work)->func = (_func); \
} while (0)
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ enum {
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
const char *__lock_name; \
\
- __lock_name = #fmt#args; \
+ __lock_name = "(complete)"#fmt#args; \
\
__alloc_workqueue_key((fmt), (flags), (max_active), \
&__key, __lock_name, ##args); \
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index ab3c0dc..72f68b1 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2497,15 +2497,8 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&barr->work, wq_barrier_func);
__set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
- /*
- * Explicitly init the crosslock for wq_barrier::done, make its lock
- * key a subkey of the corresponding work. As a result we won't
- * build a dependency between wq_barrier::done and unrelated work.
- */
- lockdep_init_map_crosslock((struct lockdep_map *)&barr->done.map,
- "(complete)wq_barr::done",
- target->lockdep_map.key, 1);
- __init_completion(&barr->done);
+ init_completion_with_map(&barr->done, &target->lockdep_map);
+
barr->task = current;
/*
@@ -2611,16 +2604,14 @@ void flush_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
struct wq_flusher this_flusher = {
.list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(this_flusher.list),
.flush_color = -1,
- .done = COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(this_flusher.done),
};
int next_color;
+ init_completion_with_map(&this_flusher.done, &wq->lockdep_map);
+
if (WARN_ON(!wq_online))
return;
- lock_map_acquire(&wq->lockdep_map);
- lock_map_release(&wq->lockdep_map);
-
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
/*
@@ -2883,9 +2874,6 @@ bool flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (WARN_ON(!wq_online))
return false;
- lock_map_acquire(&work->lockdep_map);
- lock_map_release(&work->lockdep_map);
-
if (start_flush_work(work, &barr)) {
wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-10 6:51 [RESEND PATCH v2 1/2] completion: Add support for initializing completion with lockdep_map Byungchul Park
2017-10-10 6:51 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2017-10-12 7:54 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] lockdep: Remove unnecessary acquisitions wrt workqueue flush Byungchul Park
2017-10-12 15:38 ` Tejun Heo
2017-10-12 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-13 7:56 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-13 8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-13 8:48 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-16 10:58 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-16 11:06 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507618297-27470-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox