public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Radu Rendec <rrendec@arista.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lowering the log level in watchdog_dev_register when err==-EBUSY
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 19:15:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507832159.4735.47.camel@arista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171011184603.GB8756@roeck-us.net>

On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 11:46 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Radu Rendec wrote:
> > In a project I'm working on we have a valid use case where we activate
> > both the i6300esb and softdog watchdogs. We always activate i6300esb
> > first (which uses the "legacy" watchdog API) and then softdog. This
> > gets us two "error" level messages (coming from watchdog_cdev_register)
> > although softdog falls back to the "new" API and registers its char
> > device just fine.
> > 
> > Since watchdog_cdev_register/watchdog_dev_register seem to be used only
> > by watchdog_register_device and the latter always falls back to the
> > "new" API, I'm thinking about lowering the log level of these messages
> > when err is -EBUSY.
>
> I would suggest to convert the offending driver to use the watchdog subsystem
> (and along the line remove the restriction of only supporting a single
> instance). You have the hardware, so that should be a straightforward change.

Thanks for the suggestion! That makes sense. I will start working on
converting i6300esb and submit a patch in a few days.

By the way, I don't have the hardware. I'm using it with KVM (Qemu),
but I guess that's good enough since I'm not going to touch any of the
code parts that deal with the hardware.

Radu

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-12 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-11 17:46 Lowering the log level in watchdog_dev_register when err==-EBUSY Radu Rendec
2017-10-11 18:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-10-12 18:15   ` Radu Rendec [this message]
2017-10-12 19:54     ` Guenter Roeck
2017-10-13 10:46       ` Radu Rendec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1507832159.4735.47.camel@arista.com \
    --to=rrendec@arista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox