public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Ion Badulescu <ionut@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.2.19 locks up on SMP
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 14:09:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15086.42872.321353.67228@charged.uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105010140270.12259-100000@age.cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105010051490.12259-100000@age.cs.columbia.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105010140270.12259-100000@age.cs.columbia.edu>

>>>>> " " == Ion Badulescu <ionut@cs.columbia.edu> writes:

     > On Tue, 1 May 2001, Ion Badulescu wrote:
    >> I'll do another test, 2.2.18 + the NFS/SunRPC changes, and see
    >> how it goes. Hopefully they'll apply easily...

     > As I suspected, 2.2.18 + all the NFS/NFSd/SunRPC changes
     > present in 2.2.19pre10 locks up with wait_on_bh as soon as I
     > run ls -lR on a large NFS directory tree, while at the same
     > time pummeling the network and the local disks.

     > NFS is not enough to trigger the bug, the extra disk/network
     > stress *is* necessary. The network stress actually seems to be
     > enough, I just triggered the bug again...

     > 2.2.18 vanilla is fine.

     > So I guess the next round is in Trond's court. :-)

Did you apply the following patch which I put out on the lists a
couple of weeks ago?

Cheers,
  Trond

--- net/sunrpc/xprt.c.orig	Sun Mar 25 18:37:42 2001
+++ net/sunrpc/xprt.c	Wed Apr 18 11:10:21 2001
@@ -1145,9 +1145,11 @@
 		unsigned long	oldflags;
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&xprt_sock_lock, oldflags);
 		xprt->snd_task = NULL;
-		if (!rpc_wake_up_next(&xprt->sending) && xprt->stream)
+		if (!rpc_wake_up_next(&xprt->sending) && xprt->stream) {
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xprt_sock_lock, oldflags);
 			xprt_add_tcp_timer(xprt, RPCXPRT_TIMEOUT);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xprt_sock_lock, oldflags);
+		} else
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xprt_sock_lock, oldflags);
 	}
 }
 

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-01 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-28 21:21 2.2.19 locks up on SMP Ion Badulescu
2001-04-28 23:16 ` bert hubert
2001-04-28 23:09   ` idalton
2001-04-28 23:59     ` Tim Moore
2001-04-30  9:22   ` Ion Badulescu
2001-04-30 17:55 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-30 18:15   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-30 18:28     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-30 19:57     ` Alan Cox
2001-04-30 19:59       ` Ion Badulescu
2001-04-30 20:28         ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-05-01  1:09           ` Ion Badulescu
2001-05-01  4:47         ` Ion Badulescu
2001-05-01  7:27           ` Alan Cox
2001-05-01  7:29             ` Ion Badulescu
2001-05-01  7:47               ` Ion Badulescu
2001-05-01  7:55               ` Ion Badulescu
2001-05-01  9:21                 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-05-01 12:09                   ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2001-05-01 12:15                     ` Ion Badulescu
2001-05-01 13:42                       ` Trond Myklebust
2001-05-01 23:48                         ` Ion Badulescu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-03 10:11 Scott Nursten
2001-07-03 10:48 ` Scott Nursten

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15086.42872.321353.67228@charged.uio.no \
    --to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=ionut@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox