From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>,
"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <wilal.deacon@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Chris Fries <cfries@google.com>,
Dave Weinstein <olorin@google.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 0/2] printk: hash addresses printed with %p
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 19:08:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509415728.26592.40.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171030223346.GX12341@eros>
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 09:33 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 03:03:21PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc> wrote:
> > > Here is the behaviour that this set implements.
> > >
> > > For kpt_restrict==0
> > >
> > > Randomness not ready:
> > > printed with %p: (pointer) # NOTE: with padding
> > > Valid pointer:
> > > printed with %pK: deadbeefdeadbeef
> > > printed with %p: 0xdeadbeef
> > > malformed specifier (eg %i): 0xdeadbeef
> >
> > I really think we can't include SPECIAL unless _every_ callsite of %p
> > is actually doing "0x%p", and then we're replacing all of those. We're
> > not doing that, though...
> >
> > $ git grep '%p\b' | wc -l
> > 12766
> > $ git grep '0x%p\b' | wc -l
> > 18370x
> >
> > If we need some kind of special marking that this is a hashed
> > variable, that should be something other than "0x". If we're using the
> > existing "(null)" and new "(pointer)" text, maybe "(hash:xxxxxx)"
> > should be used instead? Then the (rare) callers with 0x become
> > "0x(hash:xxxx)" and naked callers produce "(hash:xxxx)".
> >
> > I think the first step for this is to just leave SPECIAL out.
>
> Thanks Kees. V9 leaves SPECIAL out. Also V9 prints the whole 64 bit
> address with the first 32 bits masked to zero. The intent being to _not_
> change the output format from what it currently is. So it will look like
> this;
>
> 00000000c09e81d0
>
> What do you think?
>
> Amusingly I think this whole conversation is going to come up again
> when we do %pa, in inverse, since %pa currently does us SPECIAL.
I once sent a patch set to remove SPECIAL from %pa
and add 0x where necessary.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3875471/
After that didn't happen, I removed the duplicated
0x%pa with a sed.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8509421/
Sending a treewide sed patch would be fine with me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-31 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-26 2:53 [PATCH V8 0/2] printk: hash addresses printed with %p Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-26 2:53 ` [PATCH V8 1/2] printk: remove tabular output for NULL pointer Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-26 4:57 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-26 6:27 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-26 8:05 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-26 9:37 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-26 14:47 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-26 23:57 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-27 0:11 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-26 2:53 ` [PATCH V8 2/2] printk: hash addresses printed with %p Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-26 2:58 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-30 21:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-10-30 22:41 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-31 0:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-10-31 2:00 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-26 3:11 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-27 13:33 ` [PATCH V8 0/2] " Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-10-31 23:35 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-11-02 8:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-11-02 10:14 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-11-02 13:43 ` Roberts, William C
2017-11-02 16:04 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-10-30 22:03 ` Kees Cook
2017-10-30 22:33 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-31 2:08 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-10-31 23:16 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-31 23:33 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-03 5:13 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1509415728.26592.40.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cfries@google.com \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=olorin@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tixxdz@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tycho@docker.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wilal.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=william.c.roberts@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox