public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: Joshua Abraham <j.abraham1776@gmail.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-dpaa2: Fix multiple assignments should be avoided
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 03:39:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1510141182.15768.17.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171108094033.d2swiivinynlatlm@mwanda>

On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 12:40 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:20:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 07:45:03PM -0500, Joshua Abraham wrote:
> > > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
> > > "CHECK: multiple assignments should be avoided"
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Abraham <j.abraham1776@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c | 3 ++-
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> > > index 0d8ed002adcb..384218946108 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> > > @@ -1661,7 +1661,8 @@ static void set_fq_affinity(struct dpaa2_eth_priv *priv)
> > >  	 * This may well change at runtime, either through irqbalance or
> > >  	 * through direct user intervention.
> > >  	 */
> > > -	rx_cpu = txc_cpu = cpumask_first(&priv->dpio_cpumask);
> > > +	rx_cpu = cpumask_first(&priv->dpio_cpumask);
> > > +	txc_cpu = rx_cpu;
> > 
> > The original code here makes much more sense, doesn't it?
> > 
> > Sometimes checkpatch is wrong :)
> 
> It feels like the majority of these multiple assignment warnings are
> wrong.  I thought it would be a good idea at first but after looking at
> a bunch of the patches it feels like we should just remove the check.

I don't have a particular opinion one way or another.

That bit was added to CodingStyle by Randy Dunlap back
in 2006 by

commit b3fc9941fbc6efe5cb77728adb0fb12be363e73e
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:   Sun Dec 10 02:18:56 2006 -0800

    [PATCH] CodingStyle updates
    
    Add some kernel coding style comments, mostly pulled from emails
    by Andrew Morton, Jesper Juhl, and Randy Dunlap.
    
    - add paragraph on switch/case indentation (with fixes)
    - add paragraph on multiple-assignments
    - add more on Braces
    - add section on Spaces; add typeof, alignof, & __attribute__ with sizeof;
      add more on postfix/prefix increment/decrement operators
    - add paragraph on function breaks in source files; add info on
      function prototype parameter names
    - add paragraph on EXPORT_SYMBOL placement
    - add section on /*-comment style, long-comment style, and data
      declarations and comments
    - correct some chapter number references that were missed when
      chapters were renumbered
    
    Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
    Acked-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
    Acked-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@gmx.de>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-08 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-08  0:45 [PATCH] staging: fsl-dpaa2: Fix multiple assignments should be avoided Joshua Abraham
2017-11-08  9:20 ` Greg KH
2017-11-08  9:40   ` Dan Carpenter
2017-11-08 11:39     ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-11-08 17:16       ` Randy Dunlap
2017-11-08 17:30         ` Joe Perches
2017-11-08 14:59   ` Josh Abraham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1510141182.15768.17.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=j.abraham1776@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox