public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Brauchli <a.brauchli@elementarea.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: allow URL >80 chars
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 11:07:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1510999663.4806.28.camel@elementarea.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1510982478.31022.3.camel@perches.com>

On Fre, 2017-11-17 at 21:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 16:56 +0100, Andreas Brauchli wrote:
> > Allow URL to exceed the 80 char limit for improved interaction in
> > adaption to ongoing but undocumented practice.
> > 
> > $ git grep -E '://\S{77}.*' -- '*.[ch]'
> > 
> > The patch checks that the URL is indeed on its own line in that it
> > allows a maximal prefix of 4 characters to account for a URL after a
> > comment (e.g. ' // https://...')
> > 
> > The URL format allows for up to 5 protocol characters before the
> > separator :// (e.g. https, git, ...). Additionally, an URL starting
> > with a "domain.tld" or "subdomain.domain" pattern (e.g.
> > 'www.kernel.org') is also accepted.
> > 
> > $rawline is used in the check as comments are removed from $line.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Brauchli <andreas.brauchli@sensirion.com>
> > ---
> >  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > index 8b80bac055e4..aed447923354 100755
> > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > @@ -2904,6 +2904,11 @@ sub process {
> >  			} elsif ($line =~ /^\+.*\bEFI_GUID\s*\(/) {
> >  				$msg_type = "";
> >  
> > +			# URL (w/ minimal padding e.g. "+ // ")
> > +			} elsif ($rawline =~ /^\+.*?\b((?:\w{1,5}:\/\/|\w+\.\w+)\S+).*$/ &&
> 
> nack.
> 
> this matches member dereference lines like
> 
> 	foo.bar = baz;
> 
> and include lines like
> 
> 	#include <foo.h>

Agreed, there are even a few false positives (all member derefs).
Apologies for failing to catch those.

Is the patch acceptable if it only catches URL with protocol specifiers
foo:// ? That would catch most cases and doesn't show false positives:
$ git grep -E '://\S{75}.*' -- '*.[ch]'

Cheers,
Andreas

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-18 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-17 15:56 [PATCH] checkpatch: allow URL >80 chars Andreas Brauchli
2017-11-18  5:21 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-18 10:07   ` Andreas Brauchli [this message]
2017-11-18 14:39     ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1510999663.4806.28.camel@elementarea.net \
    --to=a.brauchli@elementarea.net \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox