From: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] kbuild: Add P= command line flag to run checkpatch
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 22:04:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511211881.4822.61.camel@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASBKPMG5eZ2yXPL_xOYUjr+0J56YMC5VRsE6o=xqz=DzA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 01:18 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-11-17 2:01 GMT+09:00 Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>:
> > Add interpretation of a new environment variable P={1,2} in spirit of the
> > C= option, but executing checkpatch instead of sparse.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
> > Acked-by: Åsmund Østvold <asmund.ostvold@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > Makefile | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > scripts/Makefile.build | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index ccd9818..eb4bca9 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -176,6 +176,20 @@ ifndef KBUILD_CHECKSRC
> > KBUILD_CHECKSRC = 0
> > endif
> >
> > +# Run scripts/checkpatch.pl with --ignore-cfg checkpatch.cfg
> > +#
> > +# Use 'make P=1' to enable checking of only re-compiled files.
> > +# Use 'make P=2' to enable checking of *all* source files, regardless
> > +#
> > +# See the file "Documentation/dev-tools/run-checkpatch.rst" for more
> > details,
> > +#
> > +ifeq ("$(origin P)", "command line")
> > + KBUILD_CHECKPATCH = $(P)
> > +endif
> > +ifndef KBUILD_CHECKPATCH
> > + KBUILD_CHECKPATCH = 0
> > +endif
>
>
> I am unhappy about adding a new interface
> for each checker.
I see your point. I wanted to extend C= to handle checkpatch as well but see no
obvious good non-intrusive solution.
> The default of CHECK is "sparse", but
> users can override it to use another checker.
>
>
>
> As Decumentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst says,
> if you want to use coccinelle as a checker,
>
> make C=1 CHECK="scripts/coccicheck"
That works well with coccinelle since both sparse and coccinelle rely on getting
the same command line options as what's passed to the compiler, while checkpatch
is quite different:
make C=2 CHECK="\$(srctree)/scripts/checkpatch.pl"
fails, complaining about every single compiler flag.
Thanks,
Knut
> Recently, I saw a patch to use scripts/kernel-doc as a checker.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10030521/
>
>
>
> If I accept your patch,
> we would end up with
>
> KBUILD_CHECKPATCH,
> KBUILD_CHECKCOCCI
> KBUILD_CHECKDOC,
> ...
>
> This is ugly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-20 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-16 17:01 [PATCH 0/7] Support for automatic checkpatch running in the kernel Knut Omang
2017-11-16 17:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] checkpatch: Implement new --ignore-cfg parameter Knut Omang
2017-11-16 17:09 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-16 17:43 ` Knut Omang
2017-11-16 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/7] kbuild: Add P= command line flag to run checkpatch Knut Omang
2017-11-20 16:18 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-11-20 19:48 ` Jim Davis
2017-11-20 20:08 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-11-20 21:10 ` Knut Omang
2017-11-20 21:22 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-11-21 0:00 ` Jim Davis
2017-11-21 8:10 ` Knut Omang
2017-11-21 19:48 ` Jim Davis
2017-11-21 20:03 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-20 21:04 ` Knut Omang [this message]
2017-11-16 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/7] checkpatch: Add a few convenience options to disable/modify features Knut Omang
2017-11-16 17:01 ` [PATCH 4/7] Documentation: Add documentation for the new P= Makefile option Knut Omang
2017-11-16 17:01 ` [PATCH 5/7] checkpatch: Improve --fix-inplace for TABSTOP Knut Omang
2017-11-16 17:01 ` [PATCH 6/7] checkpatch: Make --ignore-cfg look recursively for the file Knut Omang
2017-11-16 17:01 ` [PATCH 7/7] Documentation: Update checkpatch --ignore-cfg description Knut Omang
2017-11-16 22:57 ` [PATCH 0/7] Support for automatic checkpatch running in the kernel Kees Cook
2017-11-17 4:47 ` Knut Omang
2017-11-17 9:08 ` Knut Omang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1511211881.4822.61.camel@oracle.com \
--to=knut.omang@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox