From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753445AbdKWXca (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:32:30 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:39120 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752423AbdKWXc3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:32:29 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbEu7LqEZNUsRY8JPu5pJ1kKTV6FmHOTEUY5Rzsyqq6H6gFiK48OvaumI09gaTMuFj+zF8elw== Message-ID: <1511479945.8829.1.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] staging: lustre: fixed some signedness warns from sparse From: Stefano Manni To: "Tobin C. Harding" , Dan Carpenter Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Drokin , Andreas Dilger , lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:32:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20171123222020.GI12736@eros> References: <20171122193831.11801-1-stefano.manni@gmail.com> <20171123045926.GD12736@eros> <20171123115138.5nku6epnct35mmha@mwanda> <20171123222020.GI12736@eros> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 (3.22.6-2.fc25) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 09:20 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 02:51:38PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:59:26PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:38:27PM +0100, Stefano Manni wrote: > > > > Fixed some signedness warnings from sparse on lustre. > > > > > > > > Stefano Manni (4): > > > >   staging: lustre: fixed signedness of some socklnd params > > > >   staging: lustre: fixed signedness of llite > > > >   staging: lustre: fixed signedness of lov > > > >   staging: lustre: fixed signedness of obdclass > > > > > > You may like to use imperative mood for your git log brief > > > descriptions > > > Stefano.   > > > > > > s/fixed/fix/ > > > > > > > Someone once chewed me a second butt hole for not using the > > imperative > > mood so I know some people care intensely about this but I think so > > long > > as you can understand the description it's fine.  I will never send > > a > > patch for that maintainer's subsystem again, btw, which is probably > > grateful for and now I can poop twice as fast so we're both > > winners. > > I try to only make these suggestions to people doing clean up patches > to > staging, with the reasoning that if we are learning we might as well > learn the correct method from the start. It's ok with your suggestion. Not a hard work to rebase 4 commit and change the commit message. Thanks, Stefano