From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S967322AbdLSNZD (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:25:03 -0500
Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:31756 "EHLO mga04.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752426AbdLSNZB (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:25:01 -0500
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,426,1508828400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="3050873"
Message-ID: <1513689898.7000.191.camel@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 14/26] pch_gbe: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        timur@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>,
        "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:24:58 +0200
In-Reply-To: <ef7d09ce-06af-ad3e-1048-3b413cc32e9b@codeaurora.org>
References: <1513661883-28662-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
         <1513661883-28662-15-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
         <1513680330.7000.167.camel@linux.intel.com>
         <ef7d09ce-06af-ad3e-1048-3b413cc32e9b@codeaurora.org>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.3-1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 07:17 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 5:45 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 00:37 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > > 

> > pci_get_bus_and_slot() still might be useful for the wired devices
> > in
> > SoC where we know for sure that domain == 0.
> > 
> 
> Then hard code the domain number as 0 while calling
> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot()
> if you know for sure that this device will never work on a non-zero
> domain.

Thanks for so detailed explanation.

Okay, I suppose you did estimate the amount of drivers / modules that
may look better with pci_get_bus_and_slot() and the result is comparable
  small.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy