From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756059AbeAHIw2 (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 03:52:28 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:35360 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755998AbeAHIw0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 03:52:26 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovsh00LuJm4qUDfyuJ1QCsLs3LDlPikD17hrfFRRHpTytoFFBMoKmpHSlK3jA5BAXSvAx4QLg== Message-ID: <1515401544.5048.67.camel@baylibre.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: meson: use one uniform 'function' name From: Jerome Brunet To: Yixun Lan , Linus Walleij Cc: Neil Armstrong , Kevin Hilman , Carlo Caione , Xingyu Chen , Martin Blumenstingl , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:52:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180108073328.205769-1-yixun.lan@amlogic.com> References: <20180108073328.205769-1-yixun.lan@amlogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.3 (3.26.3-1.fc27) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 15:33 +0800, Yixun Lan wrote: > These two patches are general improvement for meson pinctrl driver. > It make the two pinctrl trees (ee/ao) to share one uniform 'function' name for > one hardware block even its pin groups live inside two differet hardware domains, > which for example EE vs AO domain here. > > This idea is motivated by Martin's question at [1] > > [1] > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAFBinCCuQ-NK747+GHDkhZty_UMMgzCYOYFcNTrRDJgU8OM=Gw@mail.gmail.com > > > Yixun Lan (2): > pinctrl: meson: introduce a macro to have name/groups seperated > pinctrl: meson-axg: correct the pin expansion of UART_AO_B > > drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson-axg.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.h | 8 +++++--- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Hi Yixun, Honestly, I don't like the idea. I think it adds an unnecessary complexity. I don't see the point of FUNCTION_EX(uart_ao_b, _z) when you could simply write FUNCTION(uart_ao_b_z) ... especially when there is just a couple of function per SoC available on different domains. A pinctrl driver can already be challenging to understand at first, let's keep it simple and avoid adding more macros. Regards Jerome