From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
parri.andrea@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr,
akiyks@gmail.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/lkmm 05/10] README: Fix a couple of punctuation errors
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 06:20:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1518186031-17997-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180209141832.GA17505@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README
index 9a3bb5949191..dca7d823ad57 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README
@@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ IRIW+mbonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
between each pairs of reads. In other words, is smp_mb()
sufficient to cause two different reading processes to agree on
the order of a pair of writes, where each write is to a different
- variable by a different process.
+ variable by a different process?
IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
Test of independent reads from independent writes with nothing
between each pairs of reads. In other words, is anything at all
needed to cause two different reading processes to agree on the
order of a pair of writes, where each write is to a different
- variable by a different process.
+ variable by a different process?
ISA2+poonceonces.litmus
As below, but with store-release replaced with WRITE_ONCE()
--
2.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-09 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-09 14:18 [PATCH RFC tools/lkmm] Miscellaneous fixes Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-09 14:20 ` [PATCH RFC tip/lkmm 01/10] tools/memory-model: Clarify the origin/scope of the tool name Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-09 14:20 ` [PATCH RFC tip/lkmm 02/10] MAINTAINERS: Add the Memory Consistency Model subsystem Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-09 14:20 ` [PATCH RFC tip/lkmm 03/10] MAINTAINERS: List file memory-barriers.txt within the LKMM entry Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-09 14:20 ` [PATCH RFC tip/lkmm 04/10] EXP litmus_tests: Add comments explaining tests' purposes Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-09 18:46 ` Alan Stern
2018-02-10 1:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-09 14:20 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-02-09 14:20 ` [PATCH RFC tip/lkmm 06/10] EXP MAINTAINERS: Add the "LKMM" acronym Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-09 14:20 ` [PATCH RFC tip/lkmm 07/10] MAINTAINERS: Add Akira Yokosawa as an LKMM reviewer Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-09 14:20 ` [PATCH RFC tip/lkmm 08/10] EXP Remove understore from smp_mb__before_atomic() workings Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-15 22:30 ` Andrea Parri
2018-02-15 22:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-15 23:19 ` Andrea Parri
2018-02-15 23:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-09 14:20 ` [PATCH RFC tip/lkmm 09/10] EXP Remove underscore from smp_mb__after_atomic() workings Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-09 14:20 ` [PATCH RFC tip/lkmm 10/10] EXP Remove underscores from smp_mb__after_spinlock() workings Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-09 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC tools/lkmm] Miscellaneous fixes Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-09 16:06 ` [PATCH] tools/memory-model: Restore compat with herd7 7.47 ("-" -> "_") Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-09 23:46 ` [PATCH v2] tools/memory-model: Make " Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-10 1:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-10 3:03 ` Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-11 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-13 1:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-13 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-14 22:20 ` Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-14 22:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-15 15:10 ` Alan Stern
2018-02-15 15:58 ` Trial of conflict resolution of Alan's patch Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-15 17:51 ` Alan Stern
2018-02-15 19:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-15 21:51 ` Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-16 15:18 ` Alan Stern
2018-02-16 15:47 ` Andrea Parri
2018-02-16 16:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-16 22:22 ` [PATCH] tools/memory-model: remove rb-dep, smp_read_barrier_depends, and lockless_dereference Alan Stern
2018-02-16 23:22 ` Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-17 0:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-21 15:00 ` Alan Stern
2018-02-21 16:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-21 16:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-21 17:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-21 17:15 ` [PATCH] tools/memory-model: update: " Alan Stern
2018-02-21 17:58 ` Andrea Parri
2018-02-21 18:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-21 18:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-21 22:29 ` Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-24 3:22 ` Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-24 3:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-24 14:36 ` Andrea Parri
2018-02-24 16:49 ` Alan Stern
2018-02-24 18:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-24 22:47 ` Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-25 22:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-17 3:25 ` [PATCH] tools/memory-model: " Andrea Parri
2018-02-17 15:14 ` Andrea Parri
2018-02-19 17:14 ` Alan Stern
2018-02-19 17:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-19 17:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-20 14:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-20 15:17 ` Andrea Parri
2018-02-20 16:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-19 19:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-19 20:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-20 14:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-20 15:11 ` Alan Stern
2018-02-20 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-20 9:33 ` Andrea Parri
2018-02-20 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-20 15:38 ` Alan Stern
2018-02-15 22:05 ` Trial of conflict resolution of Alan's patch Andrea Parri
2018-02-15 22:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-18 15:46 ` [PATCH v2] tools/memory-model: Make compat with herd7 7.47 ("-" -> "_") Akira Yokosawa
2018-02-20 14:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1518186031-17997-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).