From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753600AbeBUSjx (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:39:53 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:40097 "EHLO mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751895AbeBUSjv (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:39:51 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224ZICO8j1f6DMkehDvpcl32a22eFSSOBu7OViD6oUzmTVOVOyQaMJUvJ1necTpGNPoo+DgEKA== Message-ID: <1519238388.55655.43.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: remove the hardcode in the definition of TCPF Macro From: Eric Dumazet To: Yafang Shao , davem@davemloft.net Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:39:48 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1519133311-22068-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com> References: <1519133311-22068-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 21:28 +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: > TCPF_ macro depends on the definition of TCP_ macro. > So it is better to define them with TCP_ marco. > > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao > --- Seems reasonable, thanks ! Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet