From: Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Wei Zhang <wzhang@fb.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v11 6/7] PCI: Unify wait for link active into generic pci
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:54:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519374244-20539-7-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519374244-20539-1-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org>
Clients such as pciehp, dpc are using pcie_wait_link_active, which waits
till the link becomes active or inactive.
Made generic function and moved it to drivers/pci/pci.c
Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
index 18a42f8..de9b0ea 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -231,25 +231,11 @@ bool pciehp_check_link_active(struct controller *ctrl)
return ret;
}
-static void __pcie_wait_link_active(struct controller *ctrl, bool active)
+static bool pcie_wait_link_active(struct controller *ctrl)
{
- int timeout = 1000;
-
- if (pciehp_check_link_active(ctrl) == active)
- return;
- while (timeout > 0) {
- msleep(10);
- timeout -= 10;
- if (pciehp_check_link_active(ctrl) == active)
- return;
- }
- ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "Data Link Layer Link Active not %s in 1000 msec\n",
- active ? "set" : "cleared");
-}
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = ctrl_dev(ctrl);
-static void pcie_wait_link_active(struct controller *ctrl)
-{
- __pcie_wait_link_active(ctrl, true);
+ return pci_wait_for_link(pdev, true);
}
static bool pci_bus_check_dev(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index f6a4dd1..f8d44b4 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -4176,6 +4176,37 @@ static int pci_pm_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * pci_wait_for_link - Wait for link till its active/inactive
+ * @pdev: Bridge device
+ * @active: waiting for active or inactive ?
+ *
+ * Use this to wait till link becomes active or inactive.
+ */
+bool pci_wait_for_link(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool active)
+{
+ int timeout = 1000;
+ bool ret;
+ u16 lnk_status;
+
+ for (;;) {
+ pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnk_status);
+ ret = !!(lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA);
+ if (ret == active)
+ return true;
+ if (timeout <= 0)
+ break;
+ timeout -= 10;
+ }
+
+ dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &pdev->dev,
+ "Data Link Layer Link Active not %s in 1000 msec\n",
+ active ? "set" : "cleared");
+
+ return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_wait_for_link);
+
void pci_reset_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
u16 ctrl;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
index 5c01c63..e15bcda 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
@@ -120,19 +120,9 @@ static int dpc_wait_rp_inactive(struct dpc_dev *dpc)
static void dpc_wait_link_inactive(struct dpc_dev *dpc)
{
- unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ;
struct pci_dev *pdev = dpc->dev->port;
- struct device *dev = &dpc->dev->device;
- u16 lnk_status;
- pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnk_status);
- while (lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA &&
- !time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
- msleep(10);
- pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnk_status);
- }
- if (lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA)
- dev_warn(dev, "Link state not disabled for DPC event\n");
+ pci_wait_for_link(pdev, false);
}
/**
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 024a1be..cb674c3 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -1195,6 +1195,7 @@ int pci_add_ext_cap_save_buffer(struct pci_dev *dev,
int pci_request_selected_regions(struct pci_dev *, int, const char *);
int pci_request_selected_regions_exclusive(struct pci_dev *, int, const char *);
void pci_release_selected_regions(struct pci_dev *, int);
+bool pci_wait_for_link(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool active);
/* drivers/pci/bus.c */
struct pci_bus *pci_bus_get(struct pci_bus *bus);
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.,
a Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-23 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-23 8:23 [PATCH v11 0/7] Address error and recovery for AER and DPC Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-23 8:23 ` [PATCH v11 1/7] PCI/AER: Rename error recovery to generic pci naming Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-23 8:23 ` [PATCH v11 2/7] PCI/AER: factor out error reporting from AER Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-23 23:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-02-26 5:32 ` poza
2018-02-26 5:39 ` poza
2018-02-26 20:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-02-23 8:24 ` [PATCH v11 3/7] PCI/ERR: add mutex to synchronize recovery Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-23 23:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-02-27 5:16 ` poza
2018-02-27 14:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-02-23 8:24 ` [PATCH v11 4/7] PCI/DPC: Unify and plumb error handling into DPC Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-24 0:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-02-27 6:06 ` poza
2018-02-23 8:24 ` [PATCH v11 5/7] PCI/AER: Unify aer error defines at single space Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-24 15:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-02-27 6:12 ` poza
2018-02-23 8:24 ` Oza Pawandeep [this message]
2018-02-24 15:41 ` [PATCH v11 6/7] PCI: Unify wait for link active into generic pci Bjorn Helgaas
2018-02-27 8:39 ` poza
2018-02-23 8:24 ` [PATCH v11 7/7] PCI/DPC: Enumerate the devices after DPC trigger event Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-23 23:12 ` [PATCH v11 0/7] Address error and recovery for AER and DPC Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1519374244-20539-7-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org \
--to=poza@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=wzhang@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).