From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jslaby@suse.com,
p.zabel@pengutronix.de, heiko@sntech.de, ed.blake@sondrel.com,
jhogan@kernel.org
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: IO space + polling mode support
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 19:31:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519407117.10722.124.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c4c5f58-a661-13c8-cc1c-8d43828982cb@huawei.com>
On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 11:02 +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 23/02/2018 10:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 02:42 +0800, John Garry wrote:
> > > There is a requirement
>
> > Where?
>
> We require it for a development board for our hip06 platform.
Okay, and this particular platform uses Synopsys IP?
> > > for supporting an 8250-compatible UART with
> > > the following profile/features:
> > > - platform device
> > > - polling mode (i.e. no interrupt support)
> > > - ACPI FW
> >
> > Elaborate this one, please.
>
> So we need to define our own HID here, and cannot use PNP compatible
> CID
> (like PNP0501) as we cannot use the 8250 PNP driver.
Why not? What are the impediments?
> This is related to the Hisi LPC ACPI support, where we would create
> an
> MFD (i.e. platform device) for the UART.
Why you can't do properly in ACPI?
> > > - IO port iotype
> > > - 16550-compatible
> > >
> > > For OF, we have 8250_of.c, and for PNP device we have 8250_pnp.c
> > > drivers. However there does not seem to any driver satisfying
> > > the above requirements. So this RFC is to find opinion on
> > > modifying the Synopsys DW 8250_dw.c driver to support these
> > > generic features.
> >
> > Synopsys 8250 is a particular case of platform drivers. It doesn't
> > satisfy "8250-compatible UART" requirement.
> Right, but I wanted to try to use the generic parts of the driver to
> support this UART to save writing yet another driver.
It's still odd. Why this one, why not 8250_foo_bar to touch instead?
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-23 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-22 18:42 [RFC PATCH 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: IO space + polling mode support John Garry
2018-02-22 18:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] serial: 8250_dw: add IO space support John Garry
2018-02-22 18:42 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] serial: 8250_dw: support polling mode John Garry
2018-02-23 17:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-02-26 10:54 ` John Garry
2018-02-23 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: IO space + polling mode support Andy Shevchenko
2018-02-23 11:02 ` John Garry
2018-02-23 17:31 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2018-02-26 9:33 ` John Garry
2018-02-26 9:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-02-26 10:45 ` John Garry
2018-02-26 11:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-02-26 11:56 ` John Garry
2018-02-26 12:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-02-26 12:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-02-26 13:15 ` John Garry
2018-02-26 15:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-02-26 15:07 ` John Garry
2018-04-12 16:31 ` John Garry
2018-02-26 12:37 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1519407117.10722.124.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ed.blake@sondrel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox