From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754787AbeBWTcQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:32:16 -0500 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:58638 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753702AbeBWTcM (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:32:12 -0500 Message-ID: <1519414328.30443.29.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: Removing architectures without upstream gcc support From: James Bottomley To: Al Viro , Guenter Roeck Cc: Alan Cox , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Richard Kuo , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Chen Liqin , Lennox Wu , Guan Xuetao , James Hogan , linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, Jonas Bonn , Stefan Kristiansson , Stafford Horne , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, David Howells Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:32:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180223181943.GF30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20180222234833.GA3047@roeck-us.net> <20180223154316.35b26857@alans-desktop> <20180223171019.GA1125@roeck-us.net> <20180223181943.GF30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 18:19 +0000, Al Viro wrote: [...] > IIRC, parisc/qemu stuff had been announced a while ago; I have, but it didn't work sufficiently for me to either boot a kernel using system emulation or start an architecture container using user emulation.  I'll try again now that qemu has gone through several revisions. > I hadn't tried that yet (got an old parisc box, so 32bit testing can > be done on that). The mailing list (linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org) does regular build testing on a variety of 32 and 64 bit hardware. James