* 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? @ 2012-12-19 22:01 Fabio Coatti 2012-12-19 22:10 ` Tom St Denis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Fabio Coatti @ 2012-12-19 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Hi, I'm testing kernels 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 on an HP Folio 9470m machine, i915 driver for a VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) 8086:0166 With 3.6.11, the brightness can be correctly set using fn+f9/10: kde shows the bar and brightness changes. With 3.7.1 kde shows the percentage bar and /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness is updated, but the screen brightness does not changes. I fear some mistakes in my .config migration to 3.7 but I can't find which one, so if someone can shed some light I will be very happy :) logs, dumps and whatever information is needed available on demand (to keep this message short) Thanks for any answer ps: I'm not subscribed, please CC: me if you don't mind, thanks. -- Fabio ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? 2012-12-19 22:01 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? Fabio Coatti @ 2012-12-19 22:10 ` Tom St Denis 2012-12-20 9:27 ` Fabio Coatti 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Tom St Denis @ 2012-12-19 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabio Coatti; +Cc: linux-kernel ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fabio Coatti" <fabio.coatti@gmail.com> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012 5:01:30 PM > Subject: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? > > Hi, > I'm testing kernels 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 on an HP Folio 9470m machine, > i915 > driver for a VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen > Core > processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) 8086:0166 > > With 3.6.11, the brightness can be correctly set using fn+f9/10: kde > shows the bar and brightness changes. > > With 3.7.1 kde shows the percentage bar and > /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness is updated, but the > screen > brightness does not changes. I had a similar problem with my Dell laptop and i915/acpi... Is there another acpi_video? device? In my case two showed up in 3.7 whereas in 3.6 there was one. In 3.7 it was controlling the wrong one apparently. Tom St Denis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? 2012-12-19 22:10 ` Tom St Denis @ 2012-12-20 9:27 ` Fabio Coatti 2013-01-12 11:22 ` Fabio Coatti 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Fabio Coatti @ 2012-12-20 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom St Denis, linux-kernel In data mercoledì 19 dicembre 2012 17:10:29, hai scritto: > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Fabio Coatti" <fabio.coatti@gmail.com> > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012 5:01:30 PM > > Subject: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? > > > > Hi, > > I'm testing kernels 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 on an HP Folio 9470m machine, > > i915 > > driver for a VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen > > Core > > processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) 8086:0166 > > > > With 3.6.11, the brightness can be correctly set using fn+f9/10: kde > > shows the bar and brightness changes. > > > > With 3.7.1 kde shows the percentage bar and > > /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness is updated, but the > > screen > > brightness does not changes. > > I had a similar problem with my Dell laptop and i915/acpi... > > Is there another acpi_video? device? In my case two showed up in 3.7 > whereas in 3.6 there was one. In 3.7 it was controlling the wrong one > apparently. Well, this seems not to be the case, I have only one acpi_video: calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/class/backlight/ totale 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 -> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight/acpi_video0 calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight totale 0 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 -- Fabio ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? 2012-12-20 9:27 ` Fabio Coatti @ 2013-01-12 11:22 ` Fabio Coatti 2013-01-12 12:42 ` Daniel Vetter 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Fabio Coatti @ 2013-01-12 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom St Denis, linux-kernel, Daniel Vetter I'm seeing the same behaviour on 3.7.2; even echo "NN" > brightness has no effect. I've tried to look at changes between 3.6.11 and 3.7.2 but probably this is beyond my skills ;) 2012/12/20 Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@gmail.com>: > In data mercoledì 19 dicembre 2012 17:10:29, hai scritto: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> > From: "Fabio Coatti" <fabio.coatti@gmail.com> >> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> > Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012 5:01:30 PM >> > Subject: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? >> > >> > Hi, >> > I'm testing kernels 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 on an HP Folio 9470m machine, >> > i915 >> > driver for a VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen >> > Core >> > processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) 8086:0166 >> > >> > With 3.6.11, the brightness can be correctly set using fn+f9/10: kde >> > shows the bar and brightness changes. >> > >> > With 3.7.1 kde shows the percentage bar and >> > /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness is updated, but the >> > screen >> > brightness does not changes. >> >> I had a similar problem with my Dell laptop and i915/acpi... >> >> Is there another acpi_video? device? In my case two showed up in 3.7 >> whereas in 3.6 there was one. In 3.7 it was controlling the wrong one >> apparently. > > Well, this seems not to be the case, I have only one acpi_video: > > calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/class/backlight/ > totale 0 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 -> > ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight/acpi_video0 > > calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight > totale 0 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 > > > > -- > Fabio -- Fabio ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? 2013-01-12 11:22 ` Fabio Coatti @ 2013-01-12 12:42 ` Daniel Vetter 2013-01-12 20:35 ` Fabio Coatti 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Daniel Vetter @ 2013-01-12 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabio Coatti; +Cc: Tom St Denis, linux-kernel On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm seeing the same behaviour on 3.7.2; even > echo "NN" > brightness has no effect. > I've tried to look at changes between 3.6.11 and 3.7.2 but probably > this is beyond my skills ;) If the regression is with the acpi_video backlight, then it's very likely not a bug in drm/i915. Quickest way to figure that out is to do a git bisect between 3.6 and 3.7, my favourite howto is: http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/ Cheers, Daniel > 2012/12/20 Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@gmail.com>: >> In data mercoledì 19 dicembre 2012 17:10:29, hai scritto: >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> > From: "Fabio Coatti" <fabio.coatti@gmail.com> >>> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> > Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012 5:01:30 PM >>> > Subject: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > I'm testing kernels 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 on an HP Folio 9470m machine, >>> > i915 >>> > driver for a VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen >>> > Core >>> > processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) 8086:0166 >>> > >>> > With 3.6.11, the brightness can be correctly set using fn+f9/10: kde >>> > shows the bar and brightness changes. >>> > >>> > With 3.7.1 kde shows the percentage bar and >>> > /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness is updated, but the >>> > screen >>> > brightness does not changes. >>> >>> I had a similar problem with my Dell laptop and i915/acpi... >>> >>> Is there another acpi_video? device? In my case two showed up in 3.7 >>> whereas in 3.6 there was one. In 3.7 it was controlling the wrong one >>> apparently. >> >> Well, this seems not to be the case, I have only one acpi_video: >> >> calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/class/backlight/ >> totale 0 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 -> >> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight/acpi_video0 >> >> calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight >> totale 0 >> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 >> >> >> >> -- >> Fabio > > > > -- > Fabio -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? 2013-01-12 12:42 ` Daniel Vetter @ 2013-01-12 20:35 ` Fabio Coatti 2013-01-14 8:13 ` Fabio Coatti 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Fabio Coatti @ 2013-01-12 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Vetter, Bob Moore, Feng Tang, Len Brown Cc: Tom St Denis, linux-kernel, Greg Kroah-Hartman well, I tried to do that, bisecting between 3.6.10 and 3.7. I'm not sure to have done that properly, as the result seems quite harmless, however here it is: d978348b300595b067b80980f6a78db09fcd584c is the first bad commit commit d978348b300595b067b80980f6a78db09fcd584c Author: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Date: Fri Aug 17 10:51:47 2012 +0800 ACPICA: Split ACPICA initialization functions to new file, utxfinit.c Split utxface.c to improve modularity and reduce file size. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> :040000 040000 57bc8451026afe02fdbc2970b152164ff4e5412a 55311ce2f9fed66501b06f93f67fa99b54d46e86 M drivers Please let me know If I've done something wrong or if I can help in other ways. Many thanks for the hint. 2013/1/12 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm seeing the same behaviour on 3.7.2; even >> echo "NN" > brightness has no effect. >> I've tried to look at changes between 3.6.11 and 3.7.2 but probably >> this is beyond my skills ;) > > If the regression is with the acpi_video backlight, then it's very > likely not a bug in drm/i915. Quickest way to figure that out is to do > a git bisect between 3.6 and 3.7, my favourite howto is: > http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/ > > Cheers, Daniel > >> 2012/12/20 Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@gmail.com>: >>> In data mercoledì 19 dicembre 2012 17:10:29, hai scritto: >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> >>>> > From: "Fabio Coatti" <fabio.coatti@gmail.com> >>>> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>> > Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012 5:01:30 PM >>>> > Subject: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? >>>> > >>>> > Hi, >>>> > I'm testing kernels 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 on an HP Folio 9470m machine, >>>> > i915 >>>> > driver for a VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen >>>> > Core >>>> > processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) 8086:0166 >>>> > >>>> > With 3.6.11, the brightness can be correctly set using fn+f9/10: kde >>>> > shows the bar and brightness changes. >>>> > >>>> > With 3.7.1 kde shows the percentage bar and >>>> > /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness is updated, but the >>>> > screen >>>> > brightness does not changes. >>>> >>>> I had a similar problem with my Dell laptop and i915/acpi... >>>> >>>> Is there another acpi_video? device? In my case two showed up in 3.7 >>>> whereas in 3.6 there was one. In 3.7 it was controlling the wrong one >>>> apparently. >>> >>> Well, this seems not to be the case, I have only one acpi_video: >>> >>> calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/class/backlight/ >>> totale 0 >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 -> >>> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight/acpi_video0 >>> >>> calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight >>> totale 0 >>> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fabio >> >> >> >> -- >> Fabio > > > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Fabio ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? 2013-01-12 20:35 ` Fabio Coatti @ 2013-01-14 8:13 ` Fabio Coatti 2013-01-14 9:50 ` joeyli 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Fabio Coatti @ 2013-01-14 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Vetter, Bob Moore, Feng Tang, Len Brown Cc: Tom St Denis, linux-kernel, Greg Kroah-Hartman While looking at a different issue (rfkill), related to this commit: ==== > a57f7f9175b8ccbc9df83ac13860488913115de4 is the first bad commit > commit a57f7f9175b8ccbc9df83ac13860488913115de4 > Author: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> > Date: Fri Aug 17 10:55:02 2012 +0800 > > ACPICA: Add Windows8/Server2012 string for _OSI method. > This change adds a new _OSI string, "Windows 2012" for both Windows 8 > and Windows Server 2012. > >From Microsoft document "How to Identify the Windows Version in ACPI > by Using _OSI", July 13, 2012. > > Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> ==== I discovered that reverting this commit (or, as suggested by joeyli <jlee@suse.com>, booting with acpi_osi="!Windows 2012" ) also fixes the brightness issue. So it seems related to the same ACPI issue, now I wonder how it's happened that I got the wrong commit while bisecting. Sorry for the noise, now the issue is still there but makes more sense ):) 2013/1/12 Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@gmail.com>: > well, I tried to do that, bisecting between 3.6.10 and 3.7. I'm not > sure to have done that properly, as the result seems quite harmless, > however here it is: > > d978348b300595b067b80980f6a78db09fcd584c is the first bad commit > commit d978348b300595b067b80980f6a78db09fcd584c > Author: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> > Date: Fri Aug 17 10:51:47 2012 +0800 > > ACPICA: Split ACPICA initialization functions to new file, utxfinit.c > > Split utxface.c to improve modularity and reduce file size. > > Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > > :040000 040000 57bc8451026afe02fdbc2970b152164ff4e5412a > 55311ce2f9fed66501b06f93f67fa99b54d46e86 M drivers > > Please let me know If I've done something wrong or if I can help in other ways. > > Many thanks for the hint. > > > 2013/1/12 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>: >> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'm seeing the same behaviour on 3.7.2; even >>> echo "NN" > brightness has no effect. >>> I've tried to look at changes between 3.6.11 and 3.7.2 but probably >>> this is beyond my skills ;) >> >> If the regression is with the acpi_video backlight, then it's very >> likely not a bug in drm/i915. Quickest way to figure that out is to do >> a git bisect between 3.6 and 3.7, my favourite howto is: >> http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/ >> >> Cheers, Daniel >> >>> 2012/12/20 Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@gmail.com>: >>>> In data mercoledì 19 dicembre 2012 17:10:29, hai scritto: >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> >>>>> > From: "Fabio Coatti" <fabio.coatti@gmail.com> >>>>> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012 5:01:30 PM >>>>> > Subject: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > I'm testing kernels 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 on an HP Folio 9470m machine, >>>>> > i915 >>>>> > driver for a VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen >>>>> > Core >>>>> > processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) 8086:0166 >>>>> > >>>>> > With 3.6.11, the brightness can be correctly set using fn+f9/10: kde >>>>> > shows the bar and brightness changes. >>>>> > >>>>> > With 3.7.1 kde shows the percentage bar and >>>>> > /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness is updated, but the >>>>> > screen >>>>> > brightness does not changes. >>>>> >>>>> I had a similar problem with my Dell laptop and i915/acpi... >>>>> >>>>> Is there another acpi_video? device? In my case two showed up in 3.7 >>>>> whereas in 3.6 there was one. In 3.7 it was controlling the wrong one >>>>> apparently. >>>> >>>> Well, this seems not to be the case, I have only one acpi_video: >>>> >>>> calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/class/backlight/ >>>> totale 0 >>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 -> >>>> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight/acpi_video0 >>>> >>>> calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight >>>> totale 0 >>>> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Fabio >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fabio >> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Vetter >> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation >> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch > > > > -- > Fabio -- Fabio ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? 2013-01-14 8:13 ` Fabio Coatti @ 2013-01-14 9:50 ` joeyli 2013-01-14 11:26 ` Fabio Coatti 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: joeyli @ 2013-01-14 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabio Coatti Cc: Daniel Vetter, Bob Moore, Feng Tang, Len Brown, Tom St Denis, linux-kernel, Greg Kroah-Hartman 於 一，2013-01-14 於 09:13 +0100，Fabio Coatti 提到： > While looking at a different issue (rfkill), related to this commit: > ==== > > a57f7f9175b8ccbc9df83ac13860488913115de4 is the first bad commit > > commit a57f7f9175b8ccbc9df83ac13860488913115de4 > > Author: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> > > Date: Fri Aug 17 10:55:02 2012 +0800 > > > > ACPICA: Add Windows8/Server2012 string for _OSI method. > > This change adds a new _OSI string, "Windows 2012" for both Windows 8 > > and Windows Server 2012. > > >From Microsoft document "How to Identify the Windows Version in ACPI > > by Using _OSI", July 13, 2012. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > ==== > > I discovered that reverting this commit (or, as suggested by joeyli > <jlee@suse.com>, booting with acpi_osi="!Windows 2012" ) also fixes > the brightness issue. So it seems related to the same ACPI issue, now > I wonder how it's happened that I got the wrong commit while > bisecting. Sorry for the noise, now the issue is still there but makes > more sense ):) Use "!Windows 2012" can fallback to Windows 2009 mode for workaround rkfill button and brightness issue on your machine, but we still have problem with Windows 2012 mode. That means we need spend more time to trace the dsdt stuff for guess what's behavior on HP machine with Windows 8. Thanks a lot! Joey Lee > > > > 2013/1/12 Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@gmail.com>: > > well, I tried to do that, bisecting between 3.6.10 and 3.7. I'm not > > sure to have done that properly, as the result seems quite harmless, > > however here it is: > > > > d978348b300595b067b80980f6a78db09fcd584c is the first bad commit > > commit d978348b300595b067b80980f6a78db09fcd584c > > Author: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> > > Date: Fri Aug 17 10:51:47 2012 +0800 > > > > ACPICA: Split ACPICA initialization functions to new file, utxfinit.c > > > > Split utxface.c to improve modularity and reduce file size. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > > > > :040000 040000 57bc8451026afe02fdbc2970b152164ff4e5412a > > 55311ce2f9fed66501b06f93f67fa99b54d46e86 M drivers > > > > Please let me know If I've done something wrong or if I can help in other ways. > > > > Many thanks for the hint. > > > > > > 2013/1/12 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>: > >> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I'm seeing the same behaviour on 3.7.2; even > >>> echo "NN" > brightness has no effect. > >>> I've tried to look at changes between 3.6.11 and 3.7.2 but probably > >>> this is beyond my skills ;) > >> > >> If the regression is with the acpi_video backlight, then it's very > >> likely not a bug in drm/i915. Quickest way to figure that out is to do > >> a git bisect between 3.6 and 3.7, my favourite howto is: > >> http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/ > >> > >> Cheers, Daniel > >> > >>> 2012/12/20 Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@gmail.com>: > >>>> In data mercoledì 19 dicembre 2012 17:10:29, hai scritto: > >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>> > >>>>> > From: "Fabio Coatti" <fabio.coatti@gmail.com> > >>>>> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012 5:01:30 PM > >>>>> > Subject: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Hi, > >>>>> > I'm testing kernels 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 on an HP Folio 9470m machine, > >>>>> > i915 > >>>>> > driver for a VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen > >>>>> > Core > >>>>> > processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) 8086:0166 > >>>>> > > >>>>> > With 3.6.11, the brightness can be correctly set using fn+f9/10: kde > >>>>> > shows the bar and brightness changes. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > With 3.7.1 kde shows the percentage bar and > >>>>> > /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness is updated, but the > >>>>> > screen > >>>>> > brightness does not changes. > >>>>> > >>>>> I had a similar problem with my Dell laptop and i915/acpi... > >>>>> > >>>>> Is there another acpi_video? device? In my case two showed up in 3.7 > >>>>> whereas in 3.6 there was one. In 3.7 it was controlling the wrong one > >>>>> apparently. > >>>> > >>>> Well, this seems not to be the case, I have only one acpi_video: > >>>> > >>>> calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/class/backlight/ > >>>> totale 0 > >>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 -> > >>>> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight/acpi_video0 > >>>> > >>>> calvin ~ # ls -l /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight > >>>> totale 0 > >>>> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 20 dic 09.20 acpi_video0 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Fabio > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Fabio > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel Vetter > >> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > >> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch > > > > > > > > -- > > Fabio > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? 2013-01-14 9:50 ` joeyli @ 2013-01-14 11:26 ` Fabio Coatti 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Fabio Coatti @ 2013-01-14 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: joeyli Cc: Daniel Vetter, Bob Moore, Feng Tang, Len Brown, Tom St Denis, linux-kernel, Greg Kroah-Hartman In data lunedì 14 gennaio 2013 17:50:59, joeyli ha scritto: > 於 一，2013-01-14 於 09:13 +0100，Fabio Coatti 提到： > > > While looking at a different issue (rfkill), related to this commit: > > ==== > > > > > a57f7f9175b8ccbc9df83ac13860488913115de4 is the first bad commit > > > commit a57f7f9175b8ccbc9df83ac13860488913115de4 > > > Author: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> > > > Date: Fri Aug 17 10:55:02 2012 +0800 > > > > > > ACPICA: Add Windows8/Server2012 string for _OSI method. > > > This change adds a new _OSI string, "Windows 2012" for both Windows 8 > > > and Windows Server 2012. > > > > > > >From Microsoft document "How to Identify the Windows Version in ACPI > > > > > > by Using _OSI", July 13, 2012. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > > > > ==== > > > > I discovered that reverting this commit (or, as suggested by joeyli > > <jlee@suse.com>, booting with acpi_osi="!Windows 2012" ) also fixes > > the brightness issue. So it seems related to the same ACPI issue, now > > I wonder how it's happened that I got the wrong commit while > > bisecting. Sorry for the noise, now the issue is still there but makes > > more sense ):) > > Use "!Windows 2012" can fallback to Windows 2009 mode for workaround > rkfill button and brightness issue on your machine, but we still have > problem with Windows 2012 mode. > > That means we need spend more time to trace the dsdt stuff for guess > what's behavior on HP machine with Windows 8. > > > Thanks a lot! > Joey Lee Just let me know if I can help in some way (always available for testing). Many thanks. -- Fabio ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-14 11:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-12-19 22:01 3.7.X vs 3.6.11 HP Folio 9470m brightness regression? Fabio Coatti 2012-12-19 22:10 ` Tom St Denis 2012-12-20 9:27 ` Fabio Coatti 2013-01-12 11:22 ` Fabio Coatti 2013-01-12 12:42 ` Daniel Vetter 2013-01-12 20:35 ` Fabio Coatti 2013-01-14 8:13 ` Fabio Coatti 2013-01-14 9:50 ` joeyli 2013-01-14 11:26 ` Fabio Coatti
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).